找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research; Replacement, Reducti Jan Lauwereyns Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

[复制链接]
查看: 29984|回复: 37
发表于 2025-3-21 16:55:54 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research
副标题Replacement, Reducti
编辑Jan Lauwereyns
视频video
概述Includes the concepts of humanity versus speciesism.Explores the controversy with respect to the use of nonhuman primates.Looks at the mismatch between micro-motives and macro-behavior
图书封面Titlebook: Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research; Replacement, Reducti Jan Lauwereyns Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
描述This work challenges the current reliance on "The Three R‘s" or Replacement, Reduction and Refinement which direct most animal research in the behavioral sciences. The author argues that these principles that were developed in the 1950‘s to guide the use of animals in research studies are outdated. He suggests that the notions of refinement and reduction are often ill-defined and can be useful only in cases where replacement is impossible. 
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Neuroscience; Animal Cognition; Animal Models; Animal Ethics; Behavioral Science; Bioethics; Biomedical Et
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89300-6
isbn_ebook978-3-319-89300-6
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research网络公开度




书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research被引频次




书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research被引频次学科排名




书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research年度引用




书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research年度引用学科排名




书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research读者反馈




书目名称Rethinking the Three R‘s in Animal Research读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:24:09 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89300-6Neuroscience; Animal Cognition; Animal Models; Animal Ethics; Behavioral Science; Bioethics; Biomedical Et
发表于 2025-3-22 02:55:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:23:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:41:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:18:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:24:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:08:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:04:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:21:43 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-21 18:44
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表