找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Respect for Thought; Jan Smedslund’s Lega Tobias G. Lindstad,Erik Stänicke,Jaan Valsiner Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Theo

[复制链接]
楼主: 本义
发表于 2025-3-30 08:19:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 13:55:20 | 显示全部楼层
Jan Smedslund and Psychologic: The Problem of Psychologism and the Nature of Languageressed by Smedslund himself, has not been thoroughly appreciated. I argue that it is crucial to understanding a project like the psychologic. Second, I place Smedslund’s work in a historical perspective derived from the debates surrounding psychologism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth cent
发表于 2025-3-30 17:00:57 | 显示全部楼层
The Linguistic Fore-Structure of Psychological Explanationts do not test hypotheses about the relationship between psychological process and behavior because any failure to verify would defy cultural understanding. Here I propose that the intelligibility of psychological explanations does not rest so much on cultural understandings as tautological language
发表于 2025-3-31 00:40:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 01:43:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 07:35:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 11:40:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 16:13:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 18:26:06 | 显示全部楼层
Extending Smedslund’s Psycho-Logic System into a Social Theorycial theory and from the so-called linguistic turn in the social sciences. It will be argued that developing a conceptual system for psychology as Smedslund did makes only sense if it is embedded in a broader context of social theory since psychological phenomena cannot be separated from the social
发表于 2025-3-31 23:01:57 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-19 18:08
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表