找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Researchers at Risk; Precarity, Jeopardy Deborah L. Mulligan,Patrick Alan Danaher Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s

[复制链接]
楼主: EVOKE
发表于 2025-3-25 06:37:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 10:42:07 | 显示全部楼层
“No Future for You”: Economic and Mental Health Risks in Young Spanish Researcherssis in the context of Spanish universities. Our comprehensive review suggests that the future of research may be compromised by the lack of job security and poor care for the welfare of young researchers.
发表于 2025-3-25 14:50:14 | 显示全部楼层
The Risks of Precarity: How Employment Insecurity Impacts on Early Career Researchers in Australiaise. I further point to issues with undertaking “risky” research as a precarious academic, as interviewees talked about being advised to avoid certain kinds of projects. The chapter examines precarity as emerging risks to both early career researchers’ careers and research itself.
发表于 2025-3-25 18:07:50 | 显示全部楼层
The Need to Be a Leader of Research in the United States: Take the Risk and Move Beyond Your Opponenn possible medical breakthroughs. If researchers combine leadership strategies with research to take risks, they will advance their competitive edge in grants, and uncover solutions to problems facing our societies, politics and world events.
发表于 2025-3-26 00:03:44 | 显示全部楼层
Doing Feminist, Multispecies Research About Love and Abuse Within the Neoliberalised Academy in Aoteis context, critically inclined researchers face several impediments and layers of risk. We consider these risks, and others, from our position as working class, vegan feminists who focus on love for and abuse of other species.
发表于 2025-3-26 01:29:26 | 显示全部楼层
Irony Sandwich: Reflections on Research Silencing from an Australian Silenced Researcherterns: conflict of interest accusations, claims of misconduct or unethical behaviour, public attacks and institutional reprimand were common. An embargo on my thesis prompted questions around the ideal versus the everyday practice of academic freedom.
发表于 2025-3-26 07:36:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 10:05:21 | 显示全部楼层
“Horrified by the Experience”? Reflections on a Pakistani Organisation’s Feedback About Doctoral Reses.” As a result, the university withheld its decision for the conferral of my doctoral degree for eight months. The chapter analyses the broader issues of research risk arising from this personal experience.
发表于 2025-3-26 15:37:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 17:53:08 | 显示全部楼层
Conceptualising Researchers’ Risks and Synthesising Strategies for Engaging with Those Risks: Articunstitute a springboard for the subsequent chapters’ assorted engagements with the proposition of researchers at risk. This agenda is framed in terms of a dual focus on presenting selected conceptualisations of researchers’ risks, and of synthesising particular strategies that researchers have demons
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-18 04:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表