Titlebook: On the Existence and Relevance of God; Clement Dore Book 1996 Clement Dore 1996 argue.concept.ethics.George Berkeley.god.interpret.moralit

别炫耀

The Argument from Suffering II,y are morally reprehensible. And, since the argument’s conclusion is that God does not exist, that conclusion is at odds with the envisaged premise; and so it may appear that the argument from suffering is self-undermining.

Mnemonics

Theistic Phenomenalism: An Alternative Causal Theory of Perception, is, or should be taken to be, equivalent to the former conclusion. An affirmative answer to this question is made tempting by the argument of Chapter 6 that I cannot justifiably conclude that a mind-independent desk is the cause of my seeming to see my desk.

空洞

Book 1996s causally connected to his creation. Dore defends a version of the ontological argument and refutes the atheistic argument from suffering. He argues that only God can account for the overridingness of morality. He also treats ethical supernaturalism as a type of ethical attitude theory, showing how

牵连

Book 1996n scientific explanation, theistic explanation of the empirical universe can get a foothold. His method is to adopt and defend a version of theistic (Berkeley-like) phenomenalism and, in that connection, a pragmatic-instrumentalist interpretation of scientific theories.

Subjugate

DUCE

How to Apply the Ideal Observer Theory: The Controversy over Artificial Contraception and Abortion,ter view can, paradoxically, be used to undermine some widespread contemporary theistic beliefs about precisely what it is that God favors and disfavors. The alleged wrongness of artificial contraception and abortion are cases in point.

Myocyte

9楼

modest

9楼

Barter

9楼

幸福愉悦感

10楼