找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Normative Reasons and Theism; Gerald K. Harrison Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Normative reasons.Divine c

[复制链接]
查看: 31131|回复: 45
发表于 2025-3-21 17:09:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism
编辑Gerald K. Harrison
视频video
概述Makes for believing normative reasons are favouring relations that have a single, external source.Extends divine command analysis to the entirety of the normative.Offers a whole range of confirmed pre
丛书名称Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion
图书封面Titlebook: Normative Reasons and Theism;  Gerald K. Harrison Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Normative reasons.Divine c
描述.Normative reasons are reasons to do and believe things. Intellectual inquiry seems to presuppose their existence, for we cannot justifiably conclude that we exist; that there is an external world; and that there are better and worse ways of investigating it and behaving in it, unless there are reasons to do and believe such things.  But just what in the world are normative reasons? In this book a case is made for believing normative reasons are favouring relations that have a single, external source, filling this significant gap in the literature in an area within contemporary philosophy that has quickly grown in prominence. Providing a divine command metanormative analysis of normative reasons on entirely non-religious grounds, its arguments will be relevant to both secular and non-secular audiences alike and will address key issues in meta-ethics, evolutionary theory - especially evolutionary debunking threats to moral reasons and the normative more generally - and epistemology. .
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Normative reasons; Divine command; metanormativity; Practical Reason; philosophical concept
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90796-3
isbn_softcover978-3-030-08103-4
isbn_ebook978-3-319-90796-3Series ISSN 2634-6176 Series E-ISSN 2634-6184
issn_series 2634-6176
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism网络公开度




书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism被引频次




书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism年度引用




书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism读者反馈




书目名称Normative Reasons and Theism读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:42:01 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90796-3Normative reasons; Divine command; metanormativity; Practical Reason; philosophical concept
发表于 2025-3-22 02:50:53 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-030-08103-4The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
发表于 2025-3-22 06:13:42 | 显示全部楼层
Normative Reasons and Theism978-3-319-90796-3Series ISSN 2634-6176 Series E-ISSN 2634-6184
发表于 2025-3-22 09:20:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:14:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:00:10 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,rary debate can be said to be characterized by some classic symptoms of normative autism or mind-blindness, ranging from a failure to register the mental import of the terms it deploys to literalism where rational intuitions are concerned. Finally, I describe my own journey from mind-blindness to mind-sight where Reason is concerned.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:48:55 | 显示全部楼层
The Question,stion); (b) that normative reasons should not be conflated with explanatory reasons and/or motivational reasons; and finally (c) that there are three main kinds of normative reason: epistemic, instrumental and moral.
发表于 2025-3-23 02:10:46 | 显示全部楼层
Normativity,t talk of favoring relations should be interpreted metaphorically, is rejected on the grounds that it has no positive evidence in support of it, is of questionable coherence, and violates the principle of parsimony.
发表于 2025-3-23 06:09:35 | 显示全部楼层
Unity,uitions of others (which would make no sense unless they were providing us insight into the same matter). Additionally, widespread convergence in the content of our rational intuitions, and the fact that the posit of a single mind is simpler than any multiple-bearer thesis, operates to make the unity thesis true beyond a reasonable doubt.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-11 12:16
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表