Titlebook: Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management; A Special Issue of t Christian Gollier,Mark Machina Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New

根深蒂固

书目名称Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management网络公开度




书目名称Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management被引频次




书目名称Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management被引频次学科排名




书目名称Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management年度引用




书目名称Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management年度引用学科排名




书目名称Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management读者反馈




书目名称Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management读者反馈学科排名

小淡水鱼

Metamorphosis

Non-Expected Utility and the Robustness of the Classical Insurance Paradigm,oinsurance and deductible insurance, the structure of Pareto-efficient bilateral insurance contracts, the structure of Pareto-efficient multilateral risk-sharing agreements, and self-insurance and self-protection. Most, though not all, of the basic results in this area are found to be quite robust to dropping the expected utility hypothesis.

轻推

A Comparison of the Estimates of Expected Utility and Non-Expected-Utility Preference Functionals,complete ranking) of experimentally obtaining data on such preferences. What is revealed is that the magnitude of the subject error is clearly conditional on the elicitation method used and, rather alarmingly, that the preference functional apparently employed by the subject may also be conditional on the elicitation method.

dragon

Book 1995behavior. A more realisticmodel is needed. This is particularly true when treating attitudestoward small probability events: the standard situation for insurablerisks. ..Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management. examines whether theexisting results in insurance economics are robust to more generalmodels of behavior under risk.

贪婪地吃

The Comparative Statics of Deductible Insurance in Expected- and Non-Expected-Utility Theories,mal deductible increases for utility representations in a particular class but decreases for some representations outside that class. We give results both for the demand for insurance, as well as for the equilibrium contract.

Chagrin

NOTCH

Rinne-Test

Risk-Aversion Concepts in Expected- and Non-Expected-Utility Models, different. Moreover, we show that, even in the expected utility framework, the new notion of monotone increasing risk can give better answers to some problems of comparative statics such as in portfolio choice or in partial insurance. This new notion also can suggest more intuitive approaches to inequalities measurement.

synovitis