Titlebook: Nato and the Transatlantic Alliance in the Twenty-First Century; The Twenty-Year Cris Geoffrey Lee Williams,Barkley Jared Jones Book 2001 P

印第安人

NATO: post-Gaullist Realism and the Reality of Alliance,efence programmes of the past. The Rafale fighter-bomber, the Tiger, and NH-90 helicopters were now part of a weapons programme tied into the concept of highintensity warfare, as were the need for new nuclear submarines and strategic missiles. Future needs would be very different.

议程

细微的差异

Neo-Atlanticism: Renewing the Relationship,sed to their less-than-necessary military dependence upon the USA). It was nonetheless recognized that a Europeanised NATO, as a largely conventionalised posture, did not fundamentally change the nature of theWestern Alliance. The polarised Europeanist and Atlanticist options were not what they seemed.

现任者

SIT

STALL

CRUE

联合

French Defence Firms in Transition,, international debate among academics, politicians, industrialists and ordinary citizens began to rage about the size and most beneficial uses for the anticipated savings realized from lower national defence budgets following the end of the Cold War ± often referred to as the peace dividend.

regale

HUMP

The Decline of the Western European Union,ic. These discrepancies were to have consequences for the UN peacekeeping operation in Bosnia and for European±American relations in NATO, leading in the fullness of time to an agreed military intervention in the Balkans.