找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Metaepistemology; Realism and Anti-Rea Christos Kyriacou,Robin McKenna Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 epist

[复制链接]
查看: 47040|回复: 52
发表于 2025-3-21 19:45:03 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Metaepistemology
副标题Realism and Anti-Rea
编辑Christos Kyriacou,Robin McKenna
视频video
概述Offers the first dedicated study on the core metaepistemological subject of epistemic ontology.Brings together a wide range of different philosophical perspectives on epistemic ontology, ranging from
丛书名称Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy
图书封面Titlebook: Metaepistemology; Realism and Anti-Rea Christos Kyriacou,Robin McKenna Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 epist
描述This book contains twelve chapters by leading and up-and-coming philosophers on metaepistemology, that is, on the nature, existence and authority of epistemic facts. One of the central divides in metaepistemology is between epistemic realists and epistemic anti-realists. Epistemic realists think that epistemic facts (such as the fact that you ought to believe what your evidence supports) exist independently of human judgements and practices, and that they have authority over our judgements and practices. Epistemic anti-realists think that, if epistemic facts exist at all, they are grounded in human judgements and practices, and gain any authority they have from our judgements and practices. This book considers both epistemic realist and anti-realist perspectives, as well as perspectives that ‘transcend‘ the realism/anti-realism dichotomy. As such, it constitutes the ‘state of the art‘ with regard to metaepistemology, and will shape the debate in years to come..
出版日期Book 2018
关键词epistemic ontology; metaepistemology; epistemic facts; antirealism; metaethics; moral ontology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93369-6
isbn_softcover978-3-030-06648-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-93369-6Series ISSN 2946-2851 Series E-ISSN 2946-286X
issn_series 2946-2851
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Metaepistemology影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Metaepistemology影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Metaepistemology网络公开度




书目名称Metaepistemology网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Metaepistemology被引频次




书目名称Metaepistemology被引频次学科排名




书目名称Metaepistemology年度引用




书目名称Metaepistemology年度引用学科排名




书目名称Metaepistemology读者反馈




书目名称Metaepistemology读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:58:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:43:45 | 显示全部楼层
Epistemic Reductionism and the Moral-Epistemic Disparitytemic reductionism and of the moral-epistemic disparity has been criticized by Richard Rowland (2013) and Terence Cuneo and Christos Kyriacou (2018). This paper aims to rebut these criticisms and, more generally, to clarify and strengthen the case for epistemic reductionism and the moral-epistemic disparity.
发表于 2025-3-22 05:28:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:10:51 | 显示全部楼层
Reasons Primitivism and Epistemic Expressivismivism fails quite generally. I propose that reasons primitivists can make sense of this evidential constraint on reasons for belief if they adopt a suitable expressivist account of reasons judgements. I conclude by briefly considering a metaphysical version of Smith’s argument.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:47:53 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,onnections and analogies with metaethical debates (e.g. parity and disparity arguments). We then show that this volume presents new cutting-edge work that advances metaepistemology and go on to briefly summarise the content of the rest of the volume.
发表于 2025-3-22 19:17:04 | 显示全部楼层
From , Fixed Points to , Fixed Pointsy and can be utilised to address important challenges to epistemic realism. I conclude that insofar as we have some reason to postulate moral fixed points, we have equal reason to postulate epistemic fixed points.
发表于 2025-3-23 01:10:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:59:30 | 显示全部楼层
Constitutivism About Epistemic Normativityms about the relation between accepting a norm and being motivated by it. This point has sometimes been made in connection with the transparency of belief. But its development and application to Moore-paradoxical sentences are, we believe, novel.
发表于 2025-3-23 06:59:51 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-29 04:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表