找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production; Camilla Boisen,Matthew C. Murray Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if ap

[复制链接]
查看: 20332|回复: 36
发表于 2025-3-21 19:31:03 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production
编辑Camilla Boisen,Matthew C. Murray
视频video
概述Analyzes and critiques contemporary systems of merit and academic knowledge production.Exposes the need for systemic reform to achieve diversity and equal representation of ideas within academia.Criti
图书封面Titlebook: Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production;  Camilla Boisen,Matthew C. Murray Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if ap
描述.Academia has long established itself as an institution of knowledge and ideas. Facing pressure, many academic fields and institutions have turned their attention, singularly and collectively, to the task of what to do to rectify the causes of under-representations both academic knowledge itself and who gets to be an academic producer of knowledge. Boisen and Murray argue that simply solving the contemporary symptoms of inequity in ideas, knowledge production and the academy is not enough. Political Theory must be used to analyze why dominant ideas and institutions, namely merit and the resulting meritocracy and meritocratic procedures, were given power in the first place. In using political theory and theories of justice, the book argues that academia must radically shift rather than procedurally reform these methods of evaluation in order to achieve a more coherent approach to diversity in ideas, academic knowledge producers and academic knowledge production, which are necessary to bring about other forms of social change and reform in our larger world. In questioning the ideals and the use of rival ideals to temper flawed concepts, the present motivations and justifications for
出版日期Book 2024
关键词Politics; Knowledge; Justice; Academic; Political Theory
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65498-5
isbn_softcover978-3-031-65500-5
isbn_ebook978-3-031-65498-5
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production网络公开度




书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production被引频次




书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production被引频次学科排名




书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production年度引用




书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production年度引用学科排名




书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production读者反馈




书目名称Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:36:35 | 显示全部楼层
Merit as Moral: Justifying Applications of Power,jective ideas are. Merit has taken on this kind of cleansing role for academia, it absolves humanity from the things it cannot control which is to draw a false equivalency between the concepts, their nature, and their reliance on humanity to give them power.
发表于 2025-3-22 01:14:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:53:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:05:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:48:31 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2024y in ideas, academic knowledge producers and academic knowledge production, which are necessary to bring about other forms of social change and reform in our larger world. In questioning the ideals and the use of rival ideals to temper flawed concepts, the present motivations and justifications for
发表于 2025-3-22 19:13:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:02:11 | 显示全部楼层
ssary to bring about other forms of social change and reform in our larger world. In questioning the ideals and the use of rival ideals to temper flawed concepts, the present motivations and justifications for 978-3-031-65500-5978-3-031-65498-5
发表于 2025-3-23 03:52:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:31:43 | 显示全部楼层
Merit, Justice, and the Political Theory of Academic Knowledge Production978-3-031-65498-5
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-7 05:14
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表