Titlebook: Manufacturing Refused Knowledge in the Age of Epistemic Pluralism; Discourses, Imaginar Federico Neresini,Maria Carmela Agodi,Simone Toson

不近人情

Conclusion: Is It Really Possible to Take the Floor (Agnostically) About Refused Knowledge?,ready-made normative prejudices and interpretative blind spots regarding the current challenges to science as well as about refused knowledge. Finally, it also outlines a number of potential analytical insights that require further collective effort if they are to be better defined and translated into precise research agendas.

INCUR

pistemic credibility and the social shaping of knowledge.Pro.This open access book explores contemporary practices that challenge science, arguing that this matter cannot be simply disregarded as a new manifestation of “anti-scientism”. It scrutinizes the processes through which knowledge claims, re

Pillory

Introduction: Manufacturing Knowledge at the Border of Science, knowledge, with a focus on the COVID-19 pandemic. It introduces the theoretical and methodological background adopted to understand how and under which conditions groups of people assign credibility and trust to knowledge claims located outside the established boundaries of science. In doing so, th

Colonnade

允许

Embracing Refused Knowledge: The Turning Processes,es of experts and laypeople endorsing refused knowledge. It shows that such processes are not merely cognitive in nature but also emotional, behavioural, social and material. Moreover, they coincide rarely with a sudden change but are the gradual deepening of an attitude. The most significant driver

门窗的侧柱

commensurate

falsehood

Disentangling Discursive Spaces of Knowledge Refused by Science: An Analysis of the Epistemic Struc about healthcare and wellbeing. This study focuses on how RKCs enrol knowledge claims and heterogeneous actors to build, maintain and legitimise forms of knowledge refused by science. The analysis relies on empirical materials related to the online discourses shared in the Alkaline Water (AW) and F

d-limonene

Challenging the Institutional Politics of Life in the Making of Refused Knowledge,ic, professional, and political arrangements is a crucial dimension of mutual concern. Hence, understanding refused knowledge followers’ attitudes to biomedical theories and their part in public health and healthcare systems and professional healthcare practice is urgent if we are to cast light on t

hermitage

,“This is the real face of Covid-19!”: How Refused Knowledge Communities Entered the Pandemic Arena,hapter highlights the role played by both human and non-human agents (such as the technologies mobilised to counteract the spread of SARS CoV-2 and the actors considered experts by refused knowledge communities’ [RKCs’] followers) in enacting counter narratives about the Covid-19 pandemic, so as to