Titlebook: Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms; Between Continuity a Adrian Nita Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switz

Body-Mass-Index

书目名称Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms网络公开度




书目名称Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms被引频次




书目名称Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms被引频次学科排名




书目名称Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms年度引用




书目名称Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms年度引用学科排名




书目名称Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms读者反馈




书目名称Leibniz’s Metaphysics and Adoption of Substantial Forms读者反馈学科排名

Harness

1879-8578 nces for his developing metaphysics.Brings together in one v.This anthology is about the signal change in Leibniz’s metaphysics with his explicit adoption of substantial forms in 1678-79. This change can either be seen as a moment of discontinuity with his metaphysics of maturity or as a moment of c

Bravado

,The Individual in Leibniz’s Philosophy, 1663–1686,n . (1668), . (1672–1673?), . (1676), some of his correspondence with Jakob Thomasius (1668–1669), . (1683–1685?) and his Notes on Cordemoy (., 1685), among others. Along the way, the authors discuss the relation of Leibniz’s views with those of others, especially seventeenth-century Scholastics.

果仁

织物

The Souls of Seeds,ormed seeds of animals and other living things must contain souls, entelechies or substantial forms. The issue is raised through contrast with Malebranche’s doctrine of preformation that makes no such claim.

丛林

Ccu106

Hylomorphism (Even) Without Matter? Transtemporal Sameness and the Rehabilitation of Substantial Fosameness as the decisive issue for which the idea of substantial form is invoked to answer by Leibniz. So, the author tries, on one hand, to determine the repercussion on the issue of corporeal substance and, on the other, to indicate the essential features of this model which persist even in a purely monadological view.

Foreknowledge

,Affects and Activity in Leibniz’s ,,’s development in the 1670s up to the . and considers the nature of affects in the memoir, especially the first affect which starts the thought sequence. This first affect of pleasure or pain is the key to Leibniz’s theory of active substances and in this way to the whole of Leibniz’s moral psychology and ethical metaphysics.

FATAL

,Corporeal Substances as Monadic Composites in Leibniz’s Later Philosophy,was sincere in his assertion that entities of this kind are substances. The author finishes by presenting, as a working hypothesis, the suggestion that Leibniz may have been happy with the M-Composite View throughout the remainder of his life.

Fsh238