用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law; Fábio Perin Shecaira Book 2024Latest edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

[复制链接]
查看: 26394|回复: 48
发表于 2025-3-21 19:53:30 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law
编辑Fábio Perin Shecaira
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/584/583767/583767.mp4
概述Deals with conceptual, empirical, logical, and normative questions on the use of legal scholarship by judges.Illustrates the value of the Hartian framework for the purpose of analyzing specific aspect
图书封面Titlebook: Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law;  Fábio Perin Shecaira Book 2024Latest edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under
描述.This book offers a philosophical analysis of the role played by legal scholarship in the written judicial decisions of different Western legal systems. Based on a positivist (and, more specifically, Hartian) theory of law, the book discusses the concept of a source of law and the possibility of including within that concept the writings of legal scholars. It also discusses the concept of authority and the structure of authority-based arguments, such as those that judges often employ when referring to legal scholarship in their judgments... .
出版日期Book 2024Latest edition
关键词Authorativeness of sources of law; Challenging the Association; Content Independent Reason; Decline of
版次2
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60369-3
isbn_softcover978-3-031-60371-6
isbn_ebook978-3-031-60369-3
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law网络公开度




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law被引频次




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law被引频次学科排名




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law年度引用




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law年度引用学科排名




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law读者反馈




书目名称Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:02:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:00:35 | 显示全部楼层
Fábio Perin ShecairaDeals with conceptual, empirical, logical, and normative questions on the use of legal scholarship by judges.Illustrates the value of the Hartian framework for the purpose of analyzing specific aspect
发表于 2025-3-22 05:42:34 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/583767.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 08:48:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:54:45 | 显示全部楼层
What Is a Source of Law? will be understood either as agents authorized to make law or, relatedly, as products (e.g. statutes and judicial decisions) resulting from the law-making activities of those agents. Two other possible conceptions of sources of law will be rejected with the intention of avoiding persistent jurispru
发表于 2025-3-22 18:52:18 | 显示全部楼层
Sources and Reasonsent reasons for action (a Hartian concept). Sources of law are things (such as documents and practices) systematically treated by judges as providing content-independent reasons for deciding legal cases one way or another. Hart’s notion of content-independence is revisited and defended from criticis
发表于 2025-3-23 01:02:49 | 显示全部楼层
Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law likely to serve the function of a source of law in modern municipal legal systems. This type of scholarship will be called “standard” legal scholarship; it might also be described as “legal dogmatics,” a term more commonly used in the civil law world. The chapter goes on to discuss—and reject—some
发表于 2025-3-23 04:44:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:09:50 | 显示全部楼层
Normative Questions To be sure, it does not give very precise answers to the questions, if, when, and how scholarship ought to be used in judicial argument. Jurisdictions differ significantly with respect to (among other things) reliability of available scholarly work and judicial ability to understand and apply schol
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-12 13:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表