找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives; Christian Dahlman,Eveline Feteris Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media D

[复制链接]
查看: 29010|回复: 50
发表于 2025-3-21 18:31:16 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
编辑Christian Dahlman,Eveline Feteris
视频video
概述Provides access to recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation.Offers a wide spectrum of the relevant topics and approaches, including reasoning by consequences, pluralism, proportionalit
丛书名称Law and Philosophy Library
图书封面Titlebook: Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives;  Christian Dahlman,Eveline Feteris Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media D
描述.This book offers its readers an overview of recent developments in the theory of legal argumentation written by representatives from various disciplines, including argumentation theory, philosophy of law, logic and artificial intelligence. It presents an overview of contributions representative of different academic and legal cultures, and different continents and countries. The book contains contributions on strategic maneuvering, argumentum ad absurdum, argumentum ad hominem, consequentialist argumentation, weighing and balancing, the relation between legal argumentation and truth, the distinction between the context of discovery and context of justification, and the role of constitutive and regulative rules in legal argumentation. It is based on a selection of papers that were presented in the special workshop on Legal Argumentation organized at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy held 15-20 August 2011 in Frankfurt, Germany.  .
出版日期Book 2013
关键词(Ir)rationality of Judicial Decision-Making; Advocacy in Legal Argumentation; Argumentation ad Absurdu
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4670-1
isbn_softcover978-94-017-8235-7
isbn_ebook978-94-007-4670-1Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives网络公开度




书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives被引频次




书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives被引频次学科排名




书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives年度引用




书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives年度引用学科排名




书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives读者反馈




书目名称Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:50:14 | 显示全部楼层
The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion,des a case. As a result the critical norms for evaluating argumentation are not applicable to a legal decision. In this contribution I will try to refute these two objections by showing how the ideals of a critical discussion relate to the ideals of the . and how these ideals function as starting po
发表于 2025-3-22 01:56:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:11:42 | 显示全部楼层
Construction or Reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law,best . legal argument. This is the most attractive view, not in the least because its alternatives cannot well be defended. The most important objection against this view, that the best actual argument may lead to a wrong conclusion, is rejected because it presupposes that the legal consequences wer
发表于 2025-3-22 09:23:12 | 显示全部楼层
Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive InteHart, 1994, Chap. 7). Herbert Hart suggested that, in those cases, judges act as surrogate legislatures by filling legal gaps. Indeed, this view is confirmed in this paper and made analytically clear: legal concepts can be holistically and inferentially characterized by arbitrarily large and connect
发表于 2025-3-22 13:55:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:35:07 | 显示全部楼层
Carlos Bernal the quasi-inexistence of systematic and discursive – rather than activist – studies on the subject-matter, the analysis questions the appropriateness of this framework in efforts aimed at empo978-90-6704-976-4978-90-6704-609-1
发表于 2025-3-22 22:23:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:59:42 | 显示全部楼层
Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
发表于 2025-3-23 08:03:14 | 显示全部楼层
1572-4395 entation organized at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy held 15-20 August 2011 in Frankfurt, Germany.  .978-94-017-8235-7978-94-007-4670-1Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-26 21:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表