Titlebook: Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism; An Associational Cri Matt Dawson Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pub

吞食

书目名称Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism网络公开度




书目名称Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism被引频次




书目名称Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism年度引用




书目名称Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism读者反馈




书目名称Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism读者反馈学科排名

chandel

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003423democracy; neoliberalism; political sociology; socialism; sociology

Conducive

http://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/581772.jpg

全能

Veneer

Overview: Influenced most notably by Émile Durkheim and Zygmunt Bauman, Dawson outlines how this long neglected stream of socialist theory can help us more fully understand, and possibly move beyond, the problems of neoliberalism and our conceptions of political individualism.978-1-349-43422-0978-1-137-00342-3

Preserve

节约

Privatization without Pluralism: The Late Modern Stated 6 expand upon the practical form that such a system could take. Here, attention is directed towards the state. In the next chapter the focus is economic activity and neoliberalism. These two are discussed separately partly because I reject, for reasons discussed below, the idea of the state being

著名

Responsibility without Power: Neoliberalism and Economic Democracyg discussion about forms of work,. it does suggest the inability to entirely leave the economic behind for late modern political sociology. This issue is central to our discussion of libertarian socialism in late modernity. The question of how neoliberalism impacts political individualization, in te

Lacerate

Introductionmpatibility is seen to have empirical and normative grounding. The world of socialist theory, with its industrialized working-class, collective organization and the extreme poverty of the proletariat, is seen as irrelevant to an individualized, middle-class and post-scarcity world of consumers which

NAVEN

The Political Sociology of Late Modernity: Political Individualization intended to be synonyms; late modernity encompasses the logic of social processes while neoliberalism classifies a type of capitalist economy. Since both focus upon claims of globalization and individualism, it may seem plausible that there is an ‘elective affinity’ between them. However, as this c