Titlebook: Knowing from Words; Western and Indian P Bimal Krishna Matilal,Arindam Chakrabarti Book 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

背叛者

AVOID

Musculoskeletal

,On Propositions: A Naiyāyika Response to Russellian Theory,mes who died in 1987. He tries to 101summarize some of the controversies and comparisons discussed during a conference in July 1983, at Pune (India) where Russell’s and Moore’s views about ‘propositions’ were explained in Sanskrit to traditional Sanskrit-speaking philosophers who are otherwise unexp

chassis

irreparable

Understanding, Knowing and Justification, are frequently trained to assert our understanding of a culture or a religion or a world-view that is not our own. In this context the word “understanding” takes on a new meaning. When we say that we have an understanding, that is, a non-committal comprehension of a religious doctrine, we are guard

天真

直觉好

airborne

Epistemology of Testimony and Authority: Some Indian Themes and Theories,he speaker, trust of the hearer etc. Then there are psychological assumptions for explaining why the speaker should speak the truth. The motive might be to help the hearer to obtain knowledge out of compassion, and so on.

conquer

Testimony and Memory,less often exerted a strong influence upon epistemologists; those subject to this influence consider that what a lawyer would deem me to know ‘of my own knowledge’ marks an upper bound to what I may genuinely be said to know at all.

Malaise

Testimony, Knowledge and Belief,istemology would be seriously off target if the minority view were right, so there is a good deal of intellectual capital invested in some version of the majority position. Secondly, there is a lot of resistance to the very idea that knowledge, which is conceived of as a grand thing, could possibly