找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Kant and Contemporary Epistemology; Paolo Parrini Book 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994 Immanuel Kant.Kant.epistemology

[复制链接]
查看: 31000|回复: 64
发表于 2025-3-21 19:06:49 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology
编辑Paolo Parrini
视频video
丛书名称The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science
图书封面Titlebook: Kant and Contemporary Epistemology;  Paolo Parrini Book 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994 Immanuel Kant.Kant.epistemology
描述From the mid-1960s, after the important works by J. Hintikka,S. Körner, W. Sellars and P.F. Strawson, there has been a markedrevival of Kantian epistemological thought. Against this background,featuring fruitful exchange between historical research andtheoretical prospects, the main point of the book is the discussion ofKantian theory of scientific knowledge from the perspective ofpresent-day analytical philosophy and philosophy of empirical andmathematical sciences. The main topics are the problem of.apriori. knowledge in logic, mathematics and physics, the distinctionbetween analytic and synthetic judgments, the constitution of physicalobjectivity and the questions of realism and truth, the Kantianconception of time, causal laws and induction, the relations betweenKantian epistemological thought, relativity theory, quantum theory andsome recent developments of philosophy of science. .The book is addressed to research workers, specialists and scholars inthe fields of epistemology, philosophy of science and history ofphilosophy. .
出版日期Book 1994
关键词Immanuel Kant; Kant; epistemology; knowledge; logic
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0834-8
isbn_softcover978-94-010-4359-5
isbn_ebook978-94-011-0834-8Series ISSN 1566-659X Series E-ISSN 2215-1974
issn_series 1566-659X
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology网络公开度




书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology被引频次




书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology被引频次学科排名




书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology年度引用




书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology年度引用学科排名




书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology读者反馈




书目名称Kant and Contemporary Epistemology读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:09:09 | 显示全部楼层
The Late Kant and the Twentieth Century Physics,ted.experience, according to Hume’s principle, which also for Kant is beyond question, doesn’t possess any sort of intrinsic necessity. That is the reason why in the first Critique, and even more in the.occur locutions such as “empirical laws” or “empirical concepts”, which according to Criticism should be considered a mere.
发表于 2025-3-22 01:34:47 | 显示全部楼层
Logic and its Place in Nature,w to re-apply the distinctions between analytic and synthetic and between.and a.Quine) to answer these questions in what I hope is a novel and interesting way. My answers will put me at odds with both Kantians and Quineans; for I do not think that avoiding disagreements with either camp puts one wholly in the other.
发表于 2025-3-22 07:03:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:00:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:42:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:38:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:35:59 | 显示全部楼层
The Holistic Character of Kantian Intuition, quality, nor a supposed autonomous power of apprehension. What I have in mind is rather the capacity for a certain kind of . of apprehension: a kind of wholeness that is more basic than, and presupposed by, whatever kind of wholeness might be due to concepts, insofar as the latter are predicable of objects in intuition.
发表于 2025-3-23 04:52:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:52:45 | 显示全部楼层
The Unity of Science and the Unity of Nature, some such theological foundation, it appears that we have no right to presuppose the unity of nature. The demand for unified science must thus be grounded differently, in the ease that unity would bring to our thought or, perhaps, in the efficiency that it would lend to our research.’
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-11 20:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表