找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Is Science Progressive?; Ilkka Niiniluoto Book 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1984 Karl R. Popper.idea.knowledge.policy.re

[复制链接]
楼主: 召集会议
发表于 2025-3-25 03:47:42 | 显示全部楼层
Remarks on Technological Progress, each other.. If technology were just a branch of science, then the philosophy of technology would likewise be just a branch of the philosophy of science. Therefore, the common definition of technology as ’applied science’ has served as one of the reasons why the philosophy of technology has had dif
发表于 2025-3-25 07:45:23 | 显示全部楼层
Book 1984the attempt to find a satisfactory explicate for the notion of tnithlike­ ness or verisimilitude. The technical results of this search have partly appeared elsewhere, and I am also working on a systematic presentation of them in a companion volume to this book: Truthlikeness (forthcoming hopefully i
发表于 2025-3-25 13:43:00 | 显示全部楼层
0166-6991 pied with the attempt to find a satisfactory explicate for the notion of tnithlike­ ness or verisimilitude. The technical results of this search have partly appeared elsewhere, and I am also working on a systematic presentation of them in a companion volume to this book: Truthlikeness (forthcoming h
发表于 2025-3-25 16:57:51 | 显示全部楼层
The Nature of Science, of the most pertinent attempts to characterize science and the scientific method. It helps us to clarify the sense in which features such as objectivity, critical attitude, autonomy, and progress belong to the nature of science.
发表于 2025-3-25 20:59:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 00:12:50 | 显示全部楼层
Finalization, Applied Science, and Science Policy,continue to be heatedly disputed, it is natural to inquire whether the recent discussion about models of scientific change within philosophy of science can throw any light upon them.. This chapter deals with some aspects of this problem by giving special attention to the ‘finalization thesis’ of Böhme, van den Daele, and Krohn.
发表于 2025-3-26 08:12:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 12:04:07 | 显示全部楼层
Scientific Progress,rence to its method; this method is thought to be sufficient to guarantee continuous progress for science or at least to give clear criteria for recognizing ‘progressive’ developments within science..
发表于 2025-3-26 13:53:48 | 显示全部楼层
Notes on Popper as Follower of Whewell and Peirce,hese thinkers we find ‘Kantians’ from Kant himself to J.F. Fries, William Whewell, and Ernst Apelt, ‘realists’ like Bernard Bolzano and Charles Sanders Peirce, ‘hermeneutic’ historians like Wilhelm Dilthey, and working scientists like Karl Marx..
发表于 2025-3-26 19:29:28 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-23 21:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表