Titlebook: Is God the Best Explanation of Things?; A Dialogue Joshua Rasmussen,Felipe Leon Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

GALL

书目名称Is God the Best Explanation of Things?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Is God the Best Explanation of Things?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Is God the Best Explanation of Things?网络公开度




书目名称Is God the Best Explanation of Things?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Is God the Best Explanation of Things?被引频次




书目名称Is God the Best Explanation of Things?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Is God the Best Explanation of Things?年度引用




书目名称Is God the Best Explanation of Things?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Is God the Best Explanation of Things?读者反馈




书目名称Is God the Best Explanation of Things?读者反馈学科排名

Endemic

Mhc-Molecule

Book 2019te, as two professional philosophers seek to learn from each other while making their cases for their distinct positions. In their dialogue, Joshua Rasmussen and Felipe Leon examine classical and cutting-edge arguments for and against a theistic explanation of general features of reality. The book a

使痛苦

istic explanation of general features of reality. The book also provides original lines of thought based on the authors’ own contributions to the field, and offers a productive and innovative inquiry into on one of the biggest questions people ask: what is the ultimate explanation of things?.978-3-030-23754-7978-3-030-23752-3

空中

冲突

For a Foundationnt from possible causes. This argument uses modal logic to deduce necessary existence from the . of a cause of events. He proposes these arguments as initial data relevant to the larger inquiry. Rasmussen closes with an assessment of a Humean objection to necessary existence.

pacific

The Geometric Argumentfications. A key idea here is that Leon’s primary points—about modal caution and his principle of material causation—illuminate a path . the arguments for a necessary foundation. And, perhaps most significantly, we converge upon a vision of a foundation that is ..

单挑

On Finitude, Topology, and Arbitrarinessatible with the grounds against arbitrary limits. I offer reasons for an affirmative answer on all three counts. The chapter, therefore, aims to incorporate Rasmussen’s important insights into a plausible theory of foundational reality that is friendly to both theism and naturalism.

立即

Argument from Arbitrary Limits Rasmussen proposes a non-arbitrary terminus for explanation seeking. To conclude the chapter, Rasmussen reviews some things he has learned from this first section of the exchange. Here, Rasmussen displays some of the fruits of a peaceful, productive inquiry into the deepest part of existence.

共同给与