找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Interviewing Experts; Alexander Bogner,Beate Littig,Wolfgang Menz Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

[复制链接]
查看: 29573|回复: 50
发表于 2025-3-21 16:59:45 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Interviewing Experts
编辑Alexander Bogner,Beate Littig,Wolfgang Menz
视频video
丛书名称ECPR Research Methods
图书封面Titlebook: Interviewing Experts;  Alexander Bogner,Beate Littig,Wolfgang Menz Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
描述Expert interviews are today a standard method of qualitative approach in the social sciences. It is surprising that methodological reflections about the expert interview are still lacking. This book gives a comprehensive overview of their theory and practice. The contributors are experienced theorists and practitioners of expert interviews.
出版日期Book 2009
关键词empirical social research; evaluation; gender; interview; Policy; political science; social research; socia
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276
isbn_softcover978-1-349-30575-9
isbn_ebook978-0-230-24427-6Series ISSN 2947-5201 Series E-ISSN 2947-521X
issn_series 2947-5201
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2009
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Interviewing Experts影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Interviewing Experts影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Interviewing Experts网络公开度




书目名称Interviewing Experts网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Interviewing Experts被引频次




书目名称Interviewing Experts被引频次学科排名




书目名称Interviewing Experts年度引用




书目名称Interviewing Experts年度引用学科排名




书目名称Interviewing Experts读者反馈




书目名称Interviewing Experts读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:55:19 | 显示全部楼层
Interviewing Experts in Political Science: A Reflection on Gender and Policy Effects Based on Secondbout research methods as irrelevant or to attribute these to Sociology” (ibid.) should be voiced. Interestingly, gender studies in (German) political science are no exemption. Looking at introductory-, text- and handbooks one has to realize how rarely chapters on methods may be found (Dackweiler, 2004, Ebbecke-Nohlen/Nohlen, 1994).
发表于 2025-3-22 02:12:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:21:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:13:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:57:24 | 显示全部楼层
Between Scientific Standards and Claims to Efficiency: Expert Interviews in Programme Evaluationthe-art has developed in the German-speaking area that does receive Anglo-American research but which simultaneously foregrounds participatory and responsive practices as antithesis to quantitatively oriented effect analysis.
发表于 2025-3-22 17:23:47 | 显示全部楼层
On Interviewing “Good” and “Bad” Expertsplete and detailed responses, and to adjust their communication to our steering of the conversation. We also hope to meet respondents which reflect on their own social situation and who are able to provide information about their perceptions, social relations and motives.
发表于 2025-3-22 23:40:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:05:10 | 显示全部楼层
978-1-349-30575-9Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2009
发表于 2025-3-23 05:36:59 | 显示全部楼层
Interviewing Experts978-0-230-24427-6Series ISSN 2947-5201 Series E-ISSN 2947-521X
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-17 19:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表