找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts; Francesco Arcidiacono,Antonio Bova Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if appli

[复制链接]
查看: 26702|回复: 49
发表于 2025-3-21 19:31:07 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts
编辑Francesco Arcidiacono,Antonio Bova
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/473/472652/472652.mp4
概述Provides a comprehensive overview of the interpersonal argumentative processes involved in educational and professional contexts.Identifies context-dependent differences and similarities in the ways i
图书封面Titlebook: Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts;  Francesco Arcidiacono,Antonio Bova Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if appli
描述.This book provides a comprehensive overview of empirical studies based on various approaches devoted to examining the interpersonal argumentative processes involved in different contexts. It also identifies context-dependent similarities and differences in the ways in which argumentative interactions are managed by individuals in a range of educational and professional settings..How can some forms of negotiation, change and debate result from engaging in interpersonal processes during argumentation? How do interpersonal dimensions affect the interdependencies between argumentative exchanges and construction of knowledge and skills? The book clarifies these open questions by providing a discussion of theoretical and empirical issues at the forefront of research, in order to provide a view of how interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts is actually questioned and investigated..It offers readers an opportunity to discover the crucial importance of an in-depth understanding of the role and functions played by the interpersonal dynamics within argumentative interactions occurring in a wide range of educational and professional contexts..
出版日期Book 2017
关键词social interactions; interpersonal relationships; knowledge construction; skills development; parenting;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4
isbn_softcover978-3-319-86543-0
isbn_ebook978-3-319-59084-4
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts网络公开度




书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts被引频次




书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts被引频次学科排名




书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts年度引用




书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts年度引用学科排名




书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts读者反馈




书目名称Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:30:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:42:04 | 显示全部楼层
Reading Together: The Interplay Between Social and Cognitive Aspects in Argumentative and Non-argume how the two aspects are interrelated in children’s joint work. Focusing on participants’ talk while they are asked to solve together a reading comprehension task and to agree on a joint answer, we highlight the ways in which the process of dialogical construction of a common answer is influenced b
发表于 2025-3-22 07:25:51 | 显示全部楼层
The Role of the Teacher in Promoting Argumentative Interactions in the Learning Contexts of Higher during regular lessons. The aim is to bring to light the strict relationship between the types of questions asked by the teacher and the beginning and development of argumentative disciplinary discussions in the classroom, i.e., task-related discussions concerning the discipline taught in the course
发表于 2025-3-22 08:49:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:46:30 | 显示全部楼层
Processes of Negotiation in Socio-scientific Argumentation About Vegetarianism in Teacher Educationhared argument in a decision-making context. Argumentative interactions can be seen as processes involving negotiations (Baker in The role of communication in learning to model. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 303–324, ., Argumentation and education: theoretical foundations and practices. Springer
发表于 2025-3-22 19:41:37 | 显示全部楼层
Argumentation and Conflict Management in Online Epistemic Communities: A Narrative Approach to Wiki of . such as open-source programming languages or encyclopædias (for example, Wikipedia). In this chapter we focus on the case of Wikipedia, where general public participation has recently grown very quickly, in part due to egalitarian principles that encourage free participation by everyone. Howev
发表于 2025-3-22 21:55:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:11:55 | 显示全部楼层
Imaginary Scenarios as Resources to Argue for Treatment Advice in Cancer Consultations,ents with all relevant information prior to treatment. Within a discursive and conversational approach, this chapter explores how an oncologist argues for treatment advice within cancer consultations. Drawing on a data set of video-recorded post-surgical cancer consultations collected in Italy, the
发表于 2025-3-23 08:43:37 | 显示全部楼层
Notes on Similarities and Differences in Studying Argumentation: A Synthetic View,eoretical and empirical issues at the forefront of research, by ensuring a view of how interpersonal argumentation in educational and professional contexts is presently questioned and investigated. The chapter highlights the common issues of the volume concerning the analysis of how people argue in
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-5 06:22
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表