用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence; Donald H. Saklofske,Moshe Zeidner Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New Yo

[复制链接]
楼主: damped
发表于 2025-3-27 00:47:22 | 显示全部楼层
Cognitive Interference personal preoccupations that interfere with attention to the task at hand. Personality can facilitate performance (e.g., through high motivation and the ability to become absorbed in tasks), but it can also debilitate it (e.g., through worrying about the consequences of failure and being uncooperative with the tester).
发表于 2025-3-27 03:06:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 09:00:06 | 显示全部楼层
Theoretical and Empirical Relationships between Personality and Intelligencelity of interests for the different approaches to overlap. This is evident for areas of intellectual functioning like creativity or cognitive style (see Brody, 1972), but the prevailing tendency is to treat intelligence and personality as independent.
发表于 2025-3-27 13:13:51 | 显示全部楼层
Personality Trait Correlates of Intelligencek, 1985). Although some of the most influential figures in the field of intelligence and personality allude repeatedly to the inextricable web or nexus of interrelations among these two constructs (see Chapter 13), researchers have traditionally treated them as relatively independent factors in their analyses.
发表于 2025-3-27 13:53:45 | 显示全部楼层
978-1-4419-3239-6Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995
发表于 2025-3-27 18:07:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 21:55:43 | 显示全部楼层
Perspectives on Individual Differenceshttp://image.papertrans.cn/i/image/471628.jpg
发表于 2025-3-28 05:19:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 08:05:00 | 显示全部楼层
The Interface between Intelligence and Personality as Determinants of Classroom LearningI find it helpful to consider the relationship between intelligence and personality as determinants of classroom learning in terms of three broad questions:
发表于 2025-3-28 10:26:30 | 显示全部楼层
Ideological Aspects of Research on Personality and Intelligence, the presence of a chapter on ideology has to be justified, or at least explained. Would the presentation of the field not have been complete without it? Do we really need this kind of reflection from the sidelines of actual research? At the outset, I also need to define (and possibly justify) my terms of reference.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-1 05:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表