找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics; Dialogue, Rationalit Manuel Rebuschi,Martine Batt,Alain Trognon

[复制链接]
查看: 6723|回复: 54
发表于 2025-3-21 19:15:10 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics
副标题Dialogue, Rationalit
编辑Manuel Rebuschi,Martine Batt,Alain Trognon
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/471/470830/470830.mp4
概述Builds on the interdisciplinary scientific project, DiaRaFor (“Dialogue, Rationality, Formalisms”).Examines meeting points between different disciplines including logic and the social sciences and off
丛书名称Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning
图书封面Titlebook: Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics; Dialogue, Rationalit Manuel Rebuschi,Martine Batt,Alain Trognon
描述.This book presents comparisons of recent accounts in the formalization of natural language (dynamic logics and formal semantics) with informal conceptions of interaction (dialogue, natural logic and attribution of rationality) that have been developed in both psychology and epistemology. There are four parts which explore: historical and systematic studies; the formalization of context in epistemology; the formalization of reasoning in interactive contexts in psychology; the formalization of pathological conversations..Part one discusses the Erlangen School, which proposed a logical analysis of science as well as an operational reconstruction of psychological concepts. These first chapters provide epistemological and psychological insights into a conceptual reassessment of rational reconstruction from a pragmatic point of view..The second focus is on formal epistemology, where there has recently been a vigorous contribution from experts in epistemic and doxatic logics and an attempt to account for a more realistic, cognitively plausible conception of knowledge..The third part of this book examines the meeting point between logic and the human and social sciences and the fourth par
出版日期Book 2014
关键词Conversation, Pathology, Formalization; Dialogue and Calculation; Discourse in Schizophrenic Disorders
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03044-9
isbn_softcover978-3-319-35314-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-03044-9Series ISSN 2214-9120 Series E-ISSN 2214-9139
issn_series 2214-9120
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics网络公开度




书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics被引频次




书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics年度引用




书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics读者反馈




书目名称Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:07:14 | 显示全部楼层
Geometry as a Measurement-Theoretical A Priori: Lorenzen’s Defense of Relativity Against the Ontologth Poincaré, but offers a constructive account: space is not an empirical entity described by means of conventions, but a purely constructive entity constituted by the norms of spatial measurement. This space however, as Lorenzen argues, is Euclidean. In this paper, we shall analyse Lorenzen argumen
发表于 2025-3-22 01:01:47 | 显示全部楼层
Correspondence Between Evert Willem Beth and Jean Piaget (1951–1955)gy has more or less abandoned his references to classical logic in order to theorize its experimental results. Finally, the demand for collaboration between the two disciplines is becoming more and more up to date, without to be realized. As part of an effort to understand the scope of such cooperat
发表于 2025-3-22 07:41:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:38:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:54:40 | 显示全部楼层
Reasoning About Knowledge in Contextetween knowledge and context. Based on the notion of “contextual models”!contextual , a first section on “static formalism” will make it possible to capture using the same language and the same semantics, a number of epistemological positions amongst those most prominent in the recent philosophical
发表于 2025-3-22 19:15:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:02:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:25:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:25:56 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-5 04:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表