| 书目名称 | Insanity on Trial | | 编辑 | Norman J. Finkel | | 视频video | http://file.papertrans.cn/468/467683/467683.mp4 | | 丛书名称 | Perspectives in Law & Psychology | | 图书封面 |  | | 描述 | The insanity defense debate has come full circle, again. The current round began when John Hinckley opened fire; in 1843, it was Daniel M‘Naghten who pulled the trigger; the "acts" of both would-be "insanity acquittees" provoked the press, the populace, a President, and a Queen to expressions of outrage, and triggered Congress, the House of Lords, judges, jurists, psychologists, and psychiatrists to debate this most maddening matter. "Insanity" -which has historically been surrounded by defenses, defen ders, and detractors-found itself once again under siege, on trial, and undergoing rigorous cross-examination. Treatises were written on the sub ject, testimony was taken, and new rules and laws were adopted. The dust has settled, but it has not cleared. What is clear to me is that we have got it wrong, once again. The "full circle" analogy and historical parallel to M‘Naghten (1843) warrant some elaboration. Hinckley‘s firing at the President, captured by television and rerun again and again, rekindled an old debate regarding the allegedly insane and punishment (Caplan, 1984; Maeder, 1985; Szasz, 1987), a debate in which the "insanity defense" is centrally situated. The smoldering | | 出版日期 | Book 1988 | | 关键词 | brain; laws; psychology; rehabilitation; schizophrenia | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1665-7 | | isbn_softcover | 978-1-4612-8924-1 | | isbn_ebook | 978-1-4613-1665-7Series ISSN 0160-4422 | | issn_series | 0160-4422 | | copyright | Plenum Press, New York 1988 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|
派博传思国际
( 京公网安备110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-8-5 01:41
发表于 2025-3-21 17:43:23
