找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe; Premodern Views on C Regina Toepfer Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author

[复制链接]
查看: 21547|回复: 38
发表于 2025-3-21 16:45:14 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe
副标题Premodern Views on C
编辑Regina Toepfer
视频video
概述Explores medieval and premodern views of infertility.Draws on a wide range of primary sources, from medical texts to theology and philosophy.Illustrates the emergence of ‘infertility‘ and ‘childlessne
图书封面Titlebook: Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe; Premodern Views on C Regina Toepfer Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author
描述.This book examines discourses around infertility and views of childlessness in medieval and early modern Europe. ​Whereas in our own time reproductive behaviour is regulated by demographic policy in the interest of upholding the intergenerational contract, premodern rulers strove to secure the succession to their thrones and preserve family heritage. Regardless of status, infertility could have drastic consequences, above all for women, and lead to social discrimination, expulsion, and divorce... Rather than outlining a history of discrimination against or the suffering of infertile couples, this book explores the mechanisms used to justify the unequal treatment of persons without children. Exploring views on childlessness across theology, medicine, law, demonology, and ethics, it undertakes a comprehensive examination of ‘fertility’ as an identity category from the perspective of new approaches in gender and intersectionality research. Shedding light on how premodern views have shaped understandings our own time, this book is highly relevant interest to students and scholars interested in discourses around infertility across history. .
出版日期Book 2022
关键词Fertility; Parenthood; Gender; Family; Hagiography; Disability studies
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08977-0
isbn_softcover978-3-031-08979-4
isbn_ebook978-3-031-08977-0
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe网络公开度




书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe被引频次




书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe被引频次学科排名




书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe年度引用




书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe年度引用学科排名




书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe读者反馈




书目名称Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Europe读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:11:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:44:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:19:40 | 显示全部楼层
Demonology: Metaphysics of (In)Fertility,ertainly not in the Middle Ages. It was made by the current Pope of the Roman Catholic Church. Francis made a rather casual comment on childlessness in December 2017 at a morning mass, but this reaffirmed earlier statements, with the much harsher comment that those who actively prevent themselves fr
发表于 2025-3-22 11:51:07 | 显示全部楼层
Ethics: Ideals of Life with (In)Fertility,amines the arguments for and against. Heti considers whether she wants to become a mother at all to be her biggest secret, which she hides even from herself. On the one hand, she thinks of the joy that children give their parents, and on the other, of the freedom of not having children.
发表于 2025-3-22 15:49:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:44:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:00:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:45:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:28:25 | 显示全部楼层
Regina Toepfere starts and dead ends, Dennett warns, especially when it comes to the areas of thinking and reasoning. Why is the distinction important? To what extent have cognitive scientists and philosophers honored this distinction? This paper will use the current debate over the extended mind hypothesis – rou
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-10 00:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表