Titlebook: Immigration Regulation in Federal States; Challenges and Respo Sasha Baglay,Delphine Nakache Book 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Axillary

Germany and the Janus Face of Immigration Federalism: Devolution vs. Centralization formal, constitutional division of powers between the German central government (Bund) and the federal states (Länder) has certainly shaped Germany’s response to immigration and integration, federalism is only one aspect of a broader, ‘semisovereign’ model of governance that has dominated German st

Devastate

有角

The Transformation of U.S. Immigration Federalism: A Critical Reading of ,tions of immigration federalism. The primary argument of litigants challenging state and local ordinances such as Arizona’s S.B. 1070 or Hazelton, Pennsylvania’s ordinance concerning the employment and housing of unauthorized migrants has been a federal preemption argument. Simply put, the argument

任意

opportune

978-94-017-7889-3Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2014

收养

Immigration Regulation in Federal States978-94-017-8604-1Series ISSN 2214-9805 Series E-ISSN 2214-9813

predict

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8604-1Devolution vs; centralization; Governance theory; Human rights implications of immigration federalism;

Ancillary

Sasha Baglay,Delphine NakacheFills a gap in the literature relating to federal states by focusing on the interplay between sub-national jurisdictions and national policy.Includes analysis and case studies from around the world.Di

exceptional

temperate

Innovative Governance Model for a Sustainable State-Wide University-Based Telemedicine Programus, the regularity of ATC meetings, and the free exchange of information among stakeholders has encouraged establishment and success of many high-quality Arizona-based telemedicine programs over the years.