找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Hume on Motivation and Virtue; Charles R. Pigden Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2009 cognitivism

[复制链接]
楼主: CLOG
发表于 2025-3-28 16:26:15 | 显示全部楼层
Stephen Finlayo handle. From a scientific point of view, it is not easily answerable what a species is, since speciation and extinction are ongoing evolutionary processes and differentiation among species works on various traits. Contemporary systematics attempts to take into account as many criteria as possible
发表于 2025-3-28 20:08:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 00:11:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 04:36:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 08:01:14 | 显示全部楼层
Christine Swantonillips, 1980; Schubert, 1985). Such studies tend to emphasize the use of sedentary invertebrate animals as biomonitors. By comparison, birds suffer from several apparent drawbacks. They are mobile, so pollutants will be picked up from a wide, often ill-defined, area; they are long-lived, so pollutan
发表于 2025-3-29 14:59:00 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,t lives, it lives because We think that it contains important truths (Truths that illuminate the nature of Morality, the mind and reason too, The “sentiments” that make us do our duty, The role of passion and the sense of beauty); Or think that Hume is wrong, but that his faults Are kissing cousins
发表于 2025-3-29 19:36:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 21:36:46 | 显示全部楼层
If Not Non-Cognitivism, Then What?,ivation Argument while fending off its non-cognitivist conclusion, a conclusion that Smith takes to be both repugnant and false (Smith, 1994, ., henceforward MP). This presupposes two claims: (A) that Hume . arguing for non-cognitivism; and (B) that the Motivation Argument (as construed by non-cogni
发表于 2025-3-30 00:47:13 | 显示全部楼层
,Hume and the Debate on ‘Motivating Reasons’, divided into three parts. First, I lay down some general distinctions in the so-called theory of motivation (TOM), introducing two related but distinct ongoing debates. Next, in the middle and largest parts of the essay, I focus on what Hume has to say on these matters, concluding that the standard
发表于 2025-3-30 04:42:26 | 显示全部楼层
Against All Reason? Scepticism about the Instrumental Norm,. Following Kant, rationalists reject this thesis, holding that ‘ought’ rather expresses a command of . or intellect independent of desires. On Hume’s view the only genuine form of practical reason is theoretical reason operating in the service of desire, as in calculation of means to ends. Reason a
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 09:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表