Titlebook: Holocaust Denial and the Law; A Comparative Study Robert A. Kahn Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2004 Ausch

detumescence

书目名称Holocaust Denial and the Law影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Holocaust Denial and the Law影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Holocaust Denial and the Law网络公开度




书目名称Holocaust Denial and the Law网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Holocaust Denial and the Law被引频次




书目名称Holocaust Denial and the Law被引频次学科排名




书目名称Holocaust Denial and the Law年度引用




书目名称Holocaust Denial and the Law年度引用学科排名




书目名称Holocaust Denial and the Law读者反馈




书目名称Holocaust Denial and the Law读者反馈学科排名

Defiance

Book 2004udent editors had to decide whether to run ads denying the Holocaust. The book concludes that a given country‘s resolution of these dilemmas turns on its specific legal traditions and historical experiences.

散开

conscience

ARC

Nonflammable

Adversarialism, Inquisitorialism, and Judicial Noticew) norms of criminal procedure. In adversarial countries the parties (prosecution and defense) present the evidence and question the witnesses; the judge is reduced to an umpire. In inquisitorial countries the roles are reversed. It is the judge who gathers the evidence, presents it, and questions the witnesses..

enlist

Holocaust Denial, German Judges, and Political Scandalt.” In the 1995 . case, Judge Albrecht Kob acquitted two defendants who used the term “Auschwitz-Myth” in relation to Steven Spielberg’s film . Once more, controversy ensued. This time, however, the judge calmed the waters by releasing a written verdict sharply critical of right-wing extremism and Holocaust denial.

GEON

enmesh

AVANT

Book 2004secutions of Holocaust deniers. But these prosecutions often ran into trouble. Holocaust Denial and the Law relates how courts in four countries (Canada, France, Germany and the United States) resolved the dilemmas posed by Holocaust-denial litigation. It also describes how, in the United States, st