Titlebook: History, Historians and the Immigration Debate; Going Back to Where Eureka Henrich,Julian M. Simpson Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicabl

Constitution

dissolution

尖

Beyond the Apocalypse: Reframing Migration Historyand focuses on human mobility over cultural boundaries and the relation with social change. The cross-cultural migration (CCM) methodology highlights much broader societal changes, both in Europe and in the regions where migrants came from and partly returned to.

方便

Both Sides of the Tasman: History, Politics and Migration Between New Zealand and Australiahistorical parallels’. To understand the experiences of contemporary trans-Tasman migrants, we need transnational histories that promote deeper understandings of regional mobility, encourage more nuanced debate, and contribute to greater compassion in immigration policy.

主讲人

‘They Don’t Call Us Indian’: Indian Muslim Voices and the 1947 India/Pakistan Partitionhe ones who did not, and the ones who returned. The way they narrate their memories of 1947 will also challenge India’s claims to secularism. How Indian Muslims have been forced to deal with a neighbouring Islamic Pakistan should be seen, I argue, as an indictment of the postcolonial, post-partition Indian nation-state.

Generalize

esoteric

Will the Twenty-First Century World Embrace Immigration History?mmigrants’ travel across time and space to do nation-building work in the twenty-first century? The evidence presented in this paper suggests that is an unlikely outcome of globalization as more countries, including at times even the United States, debate or openly reject the immigrant paradigms as a model for their futures.

去掉

gration debates in Europe, North America, Africa, Asia and A.This book is a response to the binary thinking and misuse of history that characterize contemporary immigration debates. Subverting the traditional injunction directed at migrants to ‘go back to where they came from’, it highlights the imp

Derogate

头脑冷静

Not Singaporean Enough? Migration, History and National Identity in Singapored an existing social framework based on a static model of Singaporean multiculturalism. This raises the question of how inclusive national historical narratives are for new waves of migrants who have arrived in Singapore in recent decades and have become citizens of the island nation.