找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: History of Rationalities; Ways of Thinking fro Luca Sciortino Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

[复制链接]
查看: 25398|回复: 41
发表于 2025-3-21 19:50:02 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称History of Rationalities
副标题Ways of Thinking fro
编辑Luca Sciortino
视频video
概述A comparative analysis of the different notions of ‘ways of thinking’ introduced by philosophers.A guiding thread running through historical epistemology in an attempt to unify the researches of its a
图书封面Titlebook: History of Rationalities; Ways of Thinking fro Luca Sciortino Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li
描述.Over time, philosophers and historians of science have introduced different notions of ‘ways of thinking‘. This book presents, compares, and contrasts these different notions. It focuses primarily on Ian Hacking’s idea of ‘style of reasoning‘ in order to assess and develop it into a more systematic theory of scientific thought, arguing that Hacking’s theory implies epistemic relativism. Luca Sciortino also discusses the implications of Hacking’s ideas for the study of the problem of contingency and inevitability in the development of scientific knowledge.
出版日期Book 2023
关键词Historical epistemology; way of thinking; Ian Hacking; styles of reasoning; relativism; contingency; incom
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24004-1
isbn_softcover978-3-031-24006-5
isbn_ebook978-3-031-24004-1
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称History of Rationalities影响因子(影响力)




书目名称History of Rationalities影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称History of Rationalities网络公开度




书目名称History of Rationalities网络公开度学科排名




书目名称History of Rationalities被引频次




书目名称History of Rationalities被引频次学科排名




书目名称History of Rationalities年度引用




书目名称History of Rationalities年度引用学科排名




书目名称History of Rationalities读者反馈




书目名称History of Rationalities读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:20:56 | 显示全部楼层
epistemology in an attempt to unify the researches of its a.Over time, philosophers and historians of science have introduced different notions of ‘ways of thinking‘. This book presents, compares, and contrasts these different notions. It focuses primarily on Ian Hacking’s idea of ‘style of reasoni
发表于 2025-3-22 01:08:14 | 显示全部楼层
,Notions of the Concept of ‘Ways of Thinking’: From Classical Historical Epistemology to Kuhn, notions capture different channels through which objectivity becomes possible, it will be possible to group them in the same genus within historical epistemology and say that all these frameworks provide a ‘history of objectivity’.
发表于 2025-3-22 08:34:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:50:28 | 显示全部楼层
,Notions of the Concept of ‘Ways of Thinking’: From Hacking to Daston and Galison,toricize Kant. I shall also show that there are substantial convergences between the styles project and Daston and Galison’s study on objectivity. Finally, following Williams’s account of truth and truthfulness, I shall argue that styles of reasoning are ways of telling the truth and ways of looking at the world.
发表于 2025-3-22 15:26:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:31:54 | 显示全部楼层
,Developing the ‘Styles Project’: Towards a ‘Theory of Styles of Reasoning’,of reasoning. Finally, I shall argue that there are other ways of thinking that differ from styles of reasoning in the sense of Hacking. What I consider a relevant difference is that only styles of reasoning have strong techniques of self-authentication, techniques that are intrinsic to their forms of reasoning.
发表于 2025-3-23 00:31:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:21:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:55:19 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24004-1Historical epistemology; way of thinking; Ian Hacking; styles of reasoning; relativism; contingency; incom
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 23:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表