Titlebook: Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition; Wayne George Deakin Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 201

corrupt

书目名称Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition网络公开度




书目名称Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition被引频次




书目名称Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition被引频次学科排名




书目名称Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition年度引用




书目名称Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition年度引用学科排名




书目名称Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition读者反馈




书目名称Hegel and the English Romantic Tradition读者反馈学科排名

Bmd955

Wayne George Deakin) and the social constructionist approach (Berger & Luckmann 1967). This brief review attempts to piece together a story that begins in the generic structural functionalist paradigm and moves to the context of healthcare and alternative conceptions of narratives and social constructionist theory, highlighting a gap in research literature.

轻信

ques four canonical writers of the English Romantic tradition, Coleridge, Wordsworth, P.B. Shelley and Mary Shelley, arguing that they, as Hegel, are engaged in a struggle towards philosophical recognition.978-1-349-50303-2978-1-137-48218-1

期满

http://image.papertrans.cn/h/image/425191.jpg

字的误用

Book 2015Re-examining English Romanticism through Hegel‘s philosophy, this book outlines and expands upon Hegel‘s theory of recognition. Deakin critiques four canonical writers of the English Romantic tradition, Coleridge, Wordsworth, P.B. Shelley and Mary Shelley, arguing that they, as Hegel, are engaged in a struggle towards philosophical recognition.

被告

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137482181Romanticism; Hegel; German Romanticism; German Idealism; English Romanticism; aesthetics; Coleridge; critiq

Employee

BRAWL

Hegelian Romanticism and the Symbiotic Alterity of Receptivity and Autonomy,ich to undertake re-readings of English Romanticism. Starting from a Hegelian stance, I argue that Romanticism can be re-read in terms of a vacillation between two positions: one of imaginative autonomy and one of necessary receptivity. I argue that what I term . of autonomy and receptivity reaches

过份

judiciousness