找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Has Liberalism Failed Women?; Assuring Equal Repre Jytte Klausen,Charles S. Maier Book 2001 Jytte Klausen and Charles S. Maier 2001 constit

[复制链接]
查看: 38662|回复: 51
发表于 2025-3-21 17:38:06 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?
副标题Assuring Equal Repre
编辑Jytte Klausen,Charles S. Maier
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Has Liberalism Failed Women?; Assuring Equal Repre Jytte Klausen,Charles S. Maier Book 2001 Jytte Klausen and Charles S. Maier 2001 constit
描述This book comes out of a conference in April of 1999 at the Center for European Studies at Harvard University on the topic of ‘Gender Parity and the Liberal Tradition: Proposals and Debates in Europe and the United States.‘ It is a collection of short essays that attempt to capture the theoretical arguments and policy changes presented at the conference. The essays are divided into three sections, each of which approaches from a different angle the central question of whether liberalism has failed women. The first section aims to frame the discussion by outlining the theoretical arguments for the amendments or revisions implied by the proponents of the Parity Movement in Europe and for the concerns raised by critics. The second describes recent changes in party rules, European legal framework, and national constitutions, as well as the gains made by women in response to rule change. The third section provides American perspectives on the lessons that parity advocates might draw from affirmative action policies and speculations about how parity rules would work in the American context. The essays are drawn from top European and American scholars.
出版日期Book 2001
关键词constitution; gender; Policy; women; work
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107502
isbn_softcover978-1-349-42641-6
isbn_ebook978-0-230-10750-2
copyrightJytte Klausen and Charles S. Maier 2001
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?网络公开度




书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?被引频次




书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?年度引用




书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?读者反馈




书目名称Has Liberalism Failed Women?读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:53:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:31:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:29:45 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2001third section provides American perspectives on the lessons that parity advocates might draw from affirmative action policies and speculations about how parity rules would work in the American context. The essays are drawn from top European and American scholars.
发表于 2025-3-22 09:25:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:56:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:17:05 | 显示全部楼层
uropean Union policies). This difficulty has prompted an image of ‘delay’ in Mediterranean countries, either in adopting productivist pathways (e.g. increasing the size of agricultural holdings) or in developing an internal market for organic products or urban food policies.
发表于 2025-3-22 21:43:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:51:37 | 显示全部楼层
Agnès Hubertncluded that the built-up expansions were predominantly on agricultural lands where 15.6 ha/year of agricultural lands were eliminated. These abrupt rates of losing agricultural lands are alarming and require adopting appropriate strategies for sustainable land use in this area.
发表于 2025-3-23 07:50:20 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-24 08:13
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表