找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Governance and Choice of Upper Secondary Education in the Nordic Countries; Access and Fairness Annette Rasmussen,Marianne Dovemark Book 20

[复制链接]
楼主: Callow
发表于 2025-3-27 00:50:57 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20595-9se public spending on the privileged students and institutions. Furthermore, the policy is contradictory to the workings of democracy since the ‘free choice’ is not open to all students but depends on location and resources. It is seen to lead to an increased polarisation, which poses a threat to un
发表于 2025-3-27 02:37:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 07:33:09 | 显示全部楼层
Mangroves as a Carbon Sink/Stocks,education in the Reykjavik metropolitan area in 2014, and then data on their standardised grades and progress at upper secondary schools were collected. The results show a pattern of school composition where some schools can select high-achieving students who tend to have a stronger social backgroun
发表于 2025-3-27 09:36:55 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45734-1ations is unfairly distributed. The entrance tickets to inclusion and participation are more accessible to some than to others. Access and opportunities still depend on the resources students bring into the education system and the opportunity structures that surround them where they live.
发表于 2025-3-27 13:51:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 17:45:19 | 显示全部楼层
Social Inclusion and Equality in Access: Comparing Vocational Education in Sweden and Denmarkon constitute a basic dilemma for education policy. Education policies in Sweden and Denmark represent two different answers to this dilemma, and the chapter considers the strengths and weaknesses of these answers. The reasons for the limited success of recent reforms are explored, and some of the o
发表于 2025-3-27 23:31:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 02:31:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 09:54:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 12:49:36 | 显示全部楼层
Revisiting Just Education for Students Last in Line – A Norwegian Perspectivecognition, and curricular justice, become pertinent, which is discussed in three parts: (1) . (2) ., and (3) . The study concludes that alternative programmes do not solve a problem but rather call attention to institutionalised constructions of student diversity as deviance, not affording them equa
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-21 00:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表