Titlebook: Global Management, Local Labour; Turkish Workers and Theo Nichols,Nadir Sugur Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publis

拿着锡

书目名称Global Management, Local Labour影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Global Management, Local Labour影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Global Management, Local Labour网络公开度




书目名称Global Management, Local Labour网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Global Management, Local Labour被引频次




书目名称Global Management, Local Labour被引频次学科排名




书目名称Global Management, Local Labour年度引用




书目名称Global Management, Local Labour年度引用学科排名




书目名称Global Management, Local Labour读者反馈




书目名称Global Management, Local Labour读者反馈学科排名

阐明

A General Accountdopt the very opposite idea as the title for this opening part of the book. For the workers who feature in these pages work in the big corporate sector, not in the USA, but in Turkey. For them, the dream is not to say ‘Farewell’ to the factory. It is to say ‘Hello’. Jobs in the big corporate sector

吹牛大王

言外之意

Muhacir Bulgarianssence of women from hitherto historical and contemporary accounts has come to be recognised as an important form of bias. In now turning to consider ethnicity rather than gender this question of visibility/ invisibility takes an interesting turn. It concerns the position of Kurds.

合乎习俗

磨碎

磨碎

plasma-cells

abracadabra

Union Autocracy, Mechanisms and Contradictions7; Michels 1959) and debate continues to the present day (Waterman 1999; Voss and Sherman 2000). But particularly in the case of developing countries – in relation to which cultural stereotypes are so often deployed – we take the view that much is to be gained from analysis of the specific historica

Airtight

Modernity and Younger Workerstürk brought into existence in 1923. In recent times there has been considerable debate about whether Atatürk and his successors conflated modernisation and westernisation and about the consequences of imposing the new society top-down. It is sometimes said, for example, that Turkey today is not one