找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Frames in the Toxicity Controversy; Risk Assessment and Arnold Tukker Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999 Evaluation.

[复制链接]
查看: 10051|回复: 44
发表于 2025-3-21 18:44:57 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy
副标题Risk Assessment and
编辑Arnold Tukker
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Frames in the Toxicity Controversy; Risk Assessment and  Arnold Tukker Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999 Evaluation.
描述Preface When you write a book like this after ten years‘ working as an environmental specialist, you end up with something that reflects your career. Of course, when I started working at the Ministry of the Environment in the Netherlands, I could not foresee that I would now be at TNO, nor that I would have performed research into chlorine, PVC, waste, etc. , that would come to form the basis for this book. But step by step, with some coincidence and with the support of several people - who were probably unaware of the crucial role that, with hindsight, they played - I arrived at a position where I could start to consider this enterprise. At this point I shall try something dangerous - thanking a few of those people who gave that support. At the same time, it is obvious that I cannot mention them all. I hope that those whom I do not mention will forgive me. A first, crucial moment in this sequence of events came quite soon after I joined TNO in 1990. Just a few weeks later, all the senior staff in my section decided to leave in order to set up their own company. I decided to stay at TNO. As a consequence, I had to manage it on my own.
出版日期Book 1999
关键词Evaluation; Policy; environment; environmental science; toxicity; ecotoxicology; industrial pollution prev
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4756-9
isbn_softcover978-94-010-5998-5
isbn_ebook978-94-011-4756-9
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy网络公开度




书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy被引频次




书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy年度引用




书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy读者反馈




书目名称Frames in the Toxicity Controversy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:38:56 | 显示全部楼层
第147612主题贴--第2楼 (沙发)
发表于 2025-3-22 01:29:40 | 显示全部楼层
板凳
发表于 2025-3-22 08:18:25 | 显示全部楼层
第4楼
发表于 2025-3-22 11:40:22 | 显示全部楼层
5楼
发表于 2025-3-22 16:26:49 | 显示全部楼层
6楼
发表于 2025-3-22 17:45:34 | 显示全部楼层
7楼
发表于 2025-3-22 23:26:15 | 显示全部楼层
8楼
发表于 2025-3-23 05:20:42 | 显示全部楼层
9楼
发表于 2025-3-23 07:31:47 | 显示全部楼层
10楼
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-29 06:02
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表