| 书目名称 | Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness |
| 副标题 | Empirical Research C |
| 编辑 | Frans Eemeren,Bart Garssen,Bert Meuffels |
| 视频video | |
| 概述 | First systematic experimental research of reasonableness conceptions of ordinary arguers.Starting from a clearly defined theoretical basis.Reporting about a continued series of experimental tests.Up t |
| 丛书名称 | Argumentation Library |
| 图书封面 |  |
| 描述 | .In .Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness., Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Bert Meuffels report on their systematic empirical research of the conventional validity of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. The experimental studies they carried out during more than ten years start from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation developed at the University of Amsterdam, their home university. In these studies they test methodically the intersubjective acceptability of the rules for critical discussion proposed in this theory by confronting ordinary arguers who have not received any special education in argumentation and fallacies with discussion fragments containing both fallacious and non-fallacious argumentative moves. The research covers a wide range of informal fallacies. In this way, the authors create a basis for comparing the theoretical reasonableness conception of pragma-dialectics with the norms for judging argumentative moves prevailing in argumentative practice. .Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness .provides a unique insight into the relationship between theoretical and practical conceptions of reasonableness, supported by extensive empirical mate |
| 出版日期 | Book 2009 |
| 关键词 | argue; argumentation; argumentation theory; dialectical profiles; fallacy; freedom; informal logic; linguis |
| 版次 | 1 |
| doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9 |
| isbn_softcover | 978-94-007-2601-7 |
| isbn_ebook | 978-90-481-2614-9Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907 |
| issn_series | 1566-7650 |
| copyright | Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 |
发表于 2025-3-21 18:41:44
