找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Equal Access to Justice; On the Duty to Pause Marco Segatti Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

[复制链接]
查看: 54142|回复: 52
发表于 2025-3-21 19:18:22 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Equal Access to Justice
副标题On the Duty to Pause
编辑Marco Segatti
视频video
概述Offers one of the first philosophical treatment of equal access to justice.Combines theoretical, empirical and practical analysis of procedural law.Contains several practical applications in controver
丛书名称Law and Philosophy Library
图书封面Titlebook: Equal Access to Justice; On the Duty to Pause Marco Segatti Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice
描述It is wrong when someone cannot exercise their rights in a court of law because they have no money to pay for a good lawyer, because they are too scared of the possible consequences, or because they simply don’t know that the law protects them. But does that mean governments have an obligation to intervene? And if so, how?This book provides the first systematic philosophical theory of equal access to justice. It begins by identifying the content of claims to equal access to justice. Then, it reviews traditional political and legal arguments on the right of access to justice, which it argues are both illuminating and insufficient. .The best comparative way to approach equal access to justice, the book argues, is to think through the requirements of a moral, pre-political, duty to – at times and provisionally – pause, cool down and listen: in other words, we ought to demand that governments step in and protect access rights, because we have a moral and pre-political interest in cultivating our ability to comply with this duty. It is the recognition of this duty which best explains both law’s potential for promoting, as well as its potential for endangering, equal justice. .In closing
出版日期Book 2024
关键词Equal access to justice; Democratic equality; Human rights law; Group litigation; Procedural law; Market
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52939-9
isbn_softcover978-3-031-52941-2
isbn_ebook978-3-031-52939-9Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Equal Access to Justice影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Equal Access to Justice影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Equal Access to Justice网络公开度




书目名称Equal Access to Justice网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Equal Access to Justice被引频次




书目名称Equal Access to Justice被引频次学科排名




书目名称Equal Access to Justice年度引用




书目名称Equal Access to Justice年度引用学科排名




书目名称Equal Access to Justice读者反馈




书目名称Equal Access to Justice读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:58:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:35:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:27:46 | 显示全部楼层
Theoretical Foundations of Entrepreneurship,relevance to the field of access to justice. Neither one of these challenges, this chapter argues, should advise us to dismiss talk of access-rights altogether. Rather, this chapter argues that they point us to where political talk of access rights requires serious scrutiny and further supplementation.
发表于 2025-3-22 10:53:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:58:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:13:49 | 显示全部楼层
Theoretical Foundations of Entrepreneurship,specification of a right to ‘equality before the law’), three dimensions of evaluative concern (remedial efficacy, procedural safeguards, and agency in legal affairs) and specific duties of assistance (positive obligations, which Governments are under an obligation to fulfill) in access to justice.
发表于 2025-3-23 00:20:14 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92279-4equal standing in open court and equal agency in legal affairs. It then speculates on educated conjectures on the practical implications of grounding one’s commitment to equal access to justice on either one of such interpretations.
发表于 2025-3-23 03:03:00 | 显示全部楼层
Anteilsbasierte Vergütung nach IFRS 2field of access to justice: the evaluation of the practical relevance of a categorical distinction between criminal and civil cases for the recognition of a right to counsel. The chapter concludes that we shouldn’t trust either one of the received interpretations to provide conclusive guidance in pr
发表于 2025-3-23 08:40:08 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-26 02:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表