Titlebook: Epistemology, Context, and Formalism; Franck Lihoreau,Manuel Rebuschi Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 STIT lo

panache

书目名称Epistemology, Context, and Formalism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Epistemology, Context, and Formalism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Epistemology, Context, and Formalism网络公开度




书目名称Epistemology, Context, and Formalism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Epistemology, Context, and Formalism被引频次




书目名称Epistemology, Context, and Formalism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Epistemology, Context, and Formalism年度引用




书目名称Epistemology, Context, and Formalism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Epistemology, Context, and Formalism读者反馈




书目名称Epistemology, Context, and Formalism读者反馈学科排名

parallelism

Knowing Who: How Perspectives and Context Interact,In this article we investigate how conceptual perspectives and context interact in the determination of the truth of sentences in which ‘knowing-wh’ constructions occur.

Inkling

itinerary

BIPED

F. Marchi,Sara Bonasia,Thomas Robertdge the gap between the two, the 13 essays collected in this book are all concerned with the notions of knowledge and context, the connections between them, and the ways in which they can be modeled, and in particular formalized. The question is of prime importance to such diverse disciplines as phi

RUPT

RUPT

温和女人

General Discussion and Conclusionsontext of the attributor. There have been recently quite a number of objections to contextualism. One objection, however, has not been discussed much at all even though it might be the most serious one so far: the so-called “Factivity Objection” according to which contextualism is inconsistent at it

semiskilled

Toward Better Theory and Practice,ty of an indexical interpretation of the knowledge operator, according to which the truth of knowledge attributions exhibit a contextual variability in such a way that knowledge in one context does not entail knowledge in every context. By means of a notion of epistemic context defined on the basis

揭穿真相

Behavior and Switch Level Simulation decision problems, just as the interpretation of standard answers to questions. I will also indicate that knowledge-that sentences are context dependent in a very same way. As a result, so I will argue, the analysis differs from the standard analyses by not just looking at relevant possible worlds.