找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: English for Writing Research Papers; Adrian Wallwork Book 20111st edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

[复制链接]
楼主: Braggart
发表于 2025-3-28 15:44:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 19:27:22 | 显示全部楼层
DiscussionWhat key skills are needed when writing the Discussion? People read papers in different ways. Readers in a hurry, may read the title and then just look at the figures! Many begin from the part that they find the most interesting, which is often the Discussion.
发表于 2025-3-29 01:55:33 | 显示全部楼层
Book 20111st editionical build-up towards various conclusions.write a title and an abstract that will attract attention and be read.decide what to include in the various parts of the paper (Introduction, Methodology, Discussion etc) .select from over 700 useful phrases .highlight your claims and contribution.avoid plag
发表于 2025-3-29 07:00:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 10:42:29 | 显示全部楼层
Avoiding Ambiguity and Vaguenessus. If referees are not clear about what you are ­saying in a particular sentence, this may affect their overall understanding of the contribution of the paper. They may thus feel that they are not in a position to judge the merits of your paper. Just two or three ambiguous sentences are enough for
发表于 2025-3-29 12:40:47 | 显示全部楼层
Clarifying Who Did Whatished in the literature. You must make it 100% clear to the reader whose methodology or results you are talking about. If you don’t, you will make it difficult for the referee to: • identify your contribution • decide how useful the contribution is • make a decision about whether this contribution i
发表于 2025-3-29 17:18:58 | 显示全部楼层
Highlighting Your Findingsdings because you have neither highlighted nor described them clearly enough, then your paper may not be published. Your contribution to the community may thus vanish into oblivion. In the words of English botanist, Sir Francis Darwin: .
发表于 2025-3-29 22:26:44 | 显示全部楼层
Hedging and Criticisingne ‘rule’ is that when you present subjective or unproven propositions, you should avoid sounding arrogant or 100% certain of what you state. This approach, known as ‘hedging’, also spread to other scientists in other Anglo societies.
发表于 2025-3-30 02:23:33 | 显示全部楼层
Titlesct to read. According to one of Britain’s top editors, writing good headlines represents about 50% of the skills vital to article writing. For this reason the gurus of research writing tend to dedicate more pages to discussing the importance of the title than they do to any section in the paper itse
发表于 2025-3-30 07:12:58 | 显示全部楼层
Abstractssion on whether the paper is relevant to their journal (without having to read the whole paper) and is thus worth submitting to referees who will then judge the paper in its entirety • a reader to identify quickly what the paper is about, to judge how relevant it is to their interests, and so to dec
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-11 11:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表