用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy; How Adam Smith’s Leg John F. M. McDermott Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A

[复制链接]
查看: 42702|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 17:59:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy
副标题How Adam Smith’s Leg
编辑John F. M. McDermott
视频video
概述Fuses theoretical and mathematical objections to enforcing Adam Smith‘s economic models.Demonstrates how public investment vastly outweighs private investment in the US.Argues that “the private sector
图书封面Titlebook: Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy; How Adam Smith’s Leg John F. M. McDermott Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A
描述This book argues that economic activity in the public sphere now underwrites private corporations, and rejects rigid adherence to traditional economic theories that no longer apply. Adam Smith‘s widely used "merchant‘s model" assumes that most investment is private, when in fact research demonstrates that public investment in the workforce through education and training far outweighs the private sector, and does not account for the growing presence of consensual pricing, the diversification of modern businesses, or the increasing internal authoritarianism of globalizing companies. With de facto public support for these adaptations undermining the universally presumed economic model, private corporations are able to increase their profits while misrepresenting the investment of their own global labor forces. This book suggests an "economy of laws" solution that balances the needed degree of central investment planning with the continuation of our pluralist economy of largely autonomous firms, principally by extending the full rights of citizens into the workplace itself..
出版日期Book 2017
关键词industrial revolution; economic development; Fundamental Welfare Theorem; Pareto efficiency; Pareto opti
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50149-9
isbn_softcover978-3-319-84328-5
isbn_ebook978-3-319-50149-9
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy网络公开度




书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy被引频次




书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy年度引用




书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy读者反馈




书目名称Employers’ Economics versus Employees’ Economy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
private investment in the US.Argues that “the private sectorThis book argues that economic activity in the public sphere now underwrites private corporations, and rejects rigid adherence to traditional economic theories that no longer apply. Adam Smith‘s widely used "merchant‘s model" assumes that m
发表于 2025-3-22 02:59:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:46:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:21:44 | 显示全部楼层
We Invest More than They,ia massive, public investment in, especially, education and training. Bizarrely, modern Economics “science” conceives of the labor force as an “unproduced input” into the economy—a free gift of nature! Supporting data tables are appended at the end of the chapter.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:39:02 | 显示全部楼层
Economics and Mis-Mathematics,ctice, in the continuum and to perform, as economists do, unrestricted Real Number operations upon them. The chapter explores the limits imposed when the Real Numbers must in the general case be restricted to only . use, and not, as now, as embodying . in Economics.
发表于 2025-3-22 18:33:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:11:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:27:50 | 显示全部楼层
The Paradoxes of Market Economics,me, as if at an auction. But both these “system” requirements are strongly belied by the facts, as is shown..The chapter develops an analysis of the dominance of . transactions, many and the most important requiring positive . for their completion.
发表于 2025-3-23 07:49:58 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-21 01:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表