Titlebook: Education in the Marketplace; An Intellectual Hist Kevin Currie-Knight Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 Marke

Tracheotomy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1992-7e funded education, they argued that private organizations, not governments, should provide education services. The Friedmans preferred a voucher system where the state provides educational funding to families but largely refrained from maintaining their own schools.

浮夸

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403938367cy’s immulnity from competitive markets. Drawing on a “public choice” approach to economics, Lieberman went on to critique public school systems, arguing not only that models of school choice via markets, but also that school-choice plans should allow and encourage for-profit schools to compete in the educational marketplace.

ALE

FANG

accordance

,“Other Conceptions, Both Powerful and Exotic”: School Choice Visions from Voices from the Politicaltably than existing public school plans. John Holt (1923–1985) favored school choice as a way to lessen the cultural grip of conventional schooling and open the way for alternative vehicles for education. In each of these plans, governments would have several roles beyond what market libertarians would assign.

割公牛膨胀

Book 2019kers interacted with law and policy? All of these questions are considered in this important text for those interested in debates over market mechanisms in education and those who are keen to understand how those arguments have changed over time. .

匍匐前进

Albert Jay Nock: Pessimism About Education by State or Market,d to true education than to training good workers. Yet, influenced by Matthew Arnold, Nock was equally skeptical that private enterprise could provide the kind of truly good (because rigorous and scholastic) education Nock believed customers would not want.

debouch

,Ayn Rand: Isabel Paterson, Private Education for a Free Society, and Education for Galt’s Gulch, thinking on which a free society depends. Private markets in education were preferred, among other reasons, because they were thought more likely to equip individuals for a free and rational society. Rand supported a role for government in education limited to giving tax credits to individuals for the purchase of education.

Adulterate

Murray Rothbard: Separating Education and the State Beyond Left and Right,instrument toward this goal. (In this, he shared much in common with education critics of the New Left) He argued that markets in educational services were justified because markets avoided coercion against individuals as well as forced standardization of instruction for all. Rothbard believed there was no role the state should play in education.

profligate