Titlebook: Distributed Computing; 17th International C Faith Ellen Fich Conference proceedings 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003 Routing.SPI

digestive-tract

书目名称Distributed Computing影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Distributed Computing影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Distributed Computing网络公开度




书目名称Distributed Computing网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Distributed Computing被引频次




书目名称Distributed Computing被引频次学科排名




书目名称Distributed Computing年度引用




书目名称Distributed Computing年度引用学科排名




书目名称Distributed Computing读者反馈




书目名称Distributed Computing读者反馈学科排名

庇护

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21481-5le. For such a dynamic model, we introduce dynamic .-intersecting quorum systems. A dynamic .-intersecting quorum system ensures that in spite of arbitrary changes in the system population, any two evolved quorums intersect with probability 1-..

legitimate

Alfred Lord Tennyson and Matthew Arnoldr incomparable to coherence but weaker than sequential consistency, and c) a range of conditions that require sequences of operations to execute atomically. These results cover most commonly used consistency conditions as well as many other conditions useful in the context of specific systems.

Cholesterol

繁殖

Timing-Based Mutual Exclusion with Local Spinning,n, we consider both possibilities. For each of these possibilities, we present an algorithm with either Θ(1) or Θ(log log .) time complexity. For the cases in which a Ω(log log .) algorithm is given, we establish matching Ω(log log .) lower bounds.

Arthritis

Arthritis

On the Locality of Consistency Conditions,r incomparable to coherence but weaker than sequential consistency, and c) a range of conditions that require sequences of operations to execute atomically. These results cover most commonly used consistency conditions as well as many other conditions useful in the context of specific systems.

pellagra

Genetics

Evacuate

On the Implementation Complexity of Specifications of Concurrent Programs, a program. We consider specifications expressed in branching time temporal logic. Our result gives a way of classifying specifications as either “easy to implement” or “difficult to implement,” and can be regarded as the first step towards a notion of “implementation complexity” of specifications.