Titlebook: Distributed Algorithms; 5th International Wo Sam Toueg,Paul G. Spirakis,Lefteris Kirousis Conference proceedings 1992 Springer-Verlag Berli

他去就结束

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88221-1round-complexities 2, 3, and 4, respectively. In each case, we show a lower bound on the number of processors that must remain correct. We show matching upper bounds for all of these by developing three new translation techniques that are each optimal in the number of processors required. These resu

MOAN

xanthelasma

Dirk Slama,Tanja Rückert,Heiner Lasiferent performance levels. Our formal statement of convergence is expressed in terms of the number of messages received, rather than time elapsed. We show that this formulation is necessary. Specifically, we prove that no method for estimating the lifetime can achieve convergence in a bounded amount

武器

有助于

Jonathan C. Schöppl,Peter F. -J. Steinhoffother writes. Now, introducing randomness in the location where a reader gets the value it returns, we get a conceptually very simple probabilistic algorithm. This is the first probabilistic algorithm for the problem. Its space complexity as well as the time complexity of a read operation are both s

背景

Instinctive

Implementing FIFO queues and stacks,stantaneously and the response time of a dequeue operation is .; this upper bound implements linearizability. If clocks are not perfectly synchronized and if message delays are variable, i.e., u>0, then, for any linearizable implementation of a queue, the response time of an enqueue operations is at

CLAY

儿童

,Efficient distributed consensus with n=(3 + ɛ)t processors,ce new techniques for the abbreviation of messages in the classical full information consensus protocol. In particular, we introduce the . technique, called that way because the values that the correct processors use to mask the faults is computed on the fly during the execution of the protocol.

Peristalsis

Using adaptive timeouts to achieve at-most-once message delivery,ferent performance levels. Our formal statement of convergence is expressed in terms of the number of messages received, rather than time elapsed. We show that this formulation is necessary. Specifically, we prove that no method for estimating the lifetime can achieve convergence in a bounded amount