找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?; Modernizing Epicurea Ken Binmore Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

[复制链接]
查看: 27169|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 19:06:03 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?
副标题Modernizing Epicurea
编辑Ken Binmore
视频video
概述Criticizes the complacency of traditional philosophy.Further develops the scientific philosophy of Epicurus.Explains important ideas in game theory without mathematics
图书封面Titlebook: Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?; Modernizing Epicurea Ken Binmore Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu
描述.Why can‘t we think straight about the big issues that face our society? Why are we taken in by the phony arguments of populists and scammers? Where are the philosophers hiding when we need them to tell us what makes sense?..They are hiding because they have nothing to say. The airy-fairy answers offered by writers of footnotes to Plato were wrong two thousand years ago, and they are still wrong now. All this time, we should have been listening to a different but equally venerable branch of matter-of-fact philosophy pioneered by the much-maligned philosopher Epicurus. His ideas were suppressed in ancient times as heretical, but the development of the theory of games and decisions makes it timely for those of us who care about science to revive his style of thinking–not just about the world around us but about ourselves as well. The price of transferring our allegiance to Epicurus and his modern followers is that we can no longer enjoy the luxury of being told what we want to hear. It would be nice if we were really equipped with a hotline to a metaphysical world of transcendental ideals, but the truth is that we are just the flotsam left behind on the beach when the evolutionary ti
出版日期Book 2020
关键词Game theory; Fairness norms; Critique of traditional philosophy; Theory of games and decisions; Greek ph
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39547-6
isbn_softcover978-3-030-39546-9
isbn_ebook978-3-030-39547-6
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?网络公开度




书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?被引频次




书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?年度引用




书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?读者反馈




书目名称Crooked Thinking or Straight Talk?读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:05:52 | 显示全部楼层
Valuing Lives,entioned elsewhere in the bible is the same tree? Either way, it is pleasing to apply the same term to the mundane notion of a game tree when talking about evaluating lives not just the life of an individual, but of a society, or our species.
发表于 2025-3-22 02:03:35 | 显示全部楼层
Wissensmanagement in der Praxis,schoolmen of today—the writers of footnotes to Plato—have nothing to offer. They idle away their time building philosophical castles in the air when in a good mood, or defining each other out of existence when they aren’t.
发表于 2025-3-22 08:15:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:24:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:17:52 | 显示全部楼层
Wissensmanagement in der Praxis,Confucius (Kong Qiu) was asked by one of his followers for the secret of human sociality. His reply is usually translated as reciprocity. How do we succeed in getting along together much of the time? You scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours.
发表于 2025-3-22 20:37:13 | 显示全部楼层
Wissensmanagement in der Praxis,Traditional philosophers don’t think evolution is relevant to morality. Sometimes they even warn against the heresy represented by evolutionary ethics. So where do they think moral principles come from?
发表于 2025-3-22 21:37:24 | 显示全部楼层
Rationality as Consistency,Engineering is usually understood to be the application of the physical sciences topractical problems in the physical world. Social engineering is the application of thesocial sciences to practical problems in the social world.
发表于 2025-3-23 01:25:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:33:20 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-2 11:52
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表