Titlebook: Critics of Enlightenment Rationalism; Gene Callahan,Kenneth B. McIntyre Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under e

incarcerate

,Heidegger’s Critique of Rationalism and Modernity,

用树皮

CBC471

Alexis de Tocqueville and the Uneasy Friendship Between Reason and Freedom,agined that their unity is too easily attained and secured. Political freedom requires virtue, and virtue requires reason, but reason is best developed when human beings are given the freedom to develop their own minds and character in association with others. Although reason and liberty are inheren

calumniate

Friedrich Nietzsche: The Hammer Goes to Monticello,he American spirit, the chapter has broad implications for interpreting a fundamental dimension of the American political tradition. Through the particular example of Jefferson, the chapter also offers a sense of Nietzsche’s broader rejection of Enlightenment rationalism and objective reasoning as s

DOLT

Michael Polanyi: A Scientist Against Scientism,emergent being, and (4) discovery and indwelling. Polanyi shows that science moves toward truth and better contact with reality by using the same tools of practical reason that produce understanding in traditions open to dialogue and discovery. Values—not just physical facts—can be real discoveries

蹒跚

悠然

Eric Voegelin and Enlightenment Rationalism,gnize the . of ontology and philosophical anthropology”; and (3) Enlightenment rationalism embraces a progressive historicism that claims to know the meaning . history thus ending the search for meaning . history.

CARK

Russell Kirk: The Mystery of Human Existence,irk also offered unique insight into Burke’s blend of natural law thinking and historical consciousness, which offers valuable insights for conservative political theory. There are real moral obligations upon us, but the mystery of human existence prevents us from delineating once and for all a perf

Osteons

Book 2020ays on each thinker are intended not merely to offer a commentary on that thinker, but also to place that thinker in the context of this larger stream of anti-rationalist thought. Thus, while this volume is not a history of anti-rationalist thought, it may contain the intimations of such a history. .

拘留

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-15759-5 the people involved. He worried about the reduction of humans to their “functions,” and he worried about an increasing tendency to treat the central mysteries of human existence—namely love and death—as problems.