Titlebook: Could there have been Nothing?; Against Metaphysical Geraldine Coggins Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Lim

专家

书目名称Could there have been Nothing?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Could there have been Nothing?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Could there have been Nothing?网络公开度




书目名称Could there have been Nothing?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Could there have been Nothing?被引频次




书目名称Could there have been Nothing?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Could there have been Nothing?年度引用




书目名称Could there have been Nothing?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Could there have been Nothing?读者反馈




书目名称Could there have been Nothing?读者反馈学科排名

预示

平常

热烈的欢迎

率直

The Metaphysics of Subtraction,3) is in doubt. In the previous chapter we considered whether the premises of the subtraction argument are true or not. In this chapter I want to look critically at the underlying argumentative approach used in all versions of the subtraction argument.

拍下盗公款

拍下盗公款

sm, the modal ontological arguments and so on. In this chapter I am drawing these two strands together in order to show how the position we hold on one of these issues affects the position we should hold on the other.

极为愤怒

Possible Worlds,sm, the modal ontological arguments and so on. In this chapter I am drawing these two strands together in order to show how the position we hold on one of these issues affects the position we should hold on the other.

遍及

独行者

Horst-Dieter Gasde,Waltraud Paul these criticisms are, as far as possible, avoided. In parallel with this I will be considering the arguments of those philosophers who disagree with metaphysical nihilism. We will see how the subtraction argument in this, its strongest form, fares against these criticisms.