找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Context, Conflict and Reasoning; Proceedings of the F Beishui Liao,Yì N. Wáng Conference proceedings 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd

[复制链接]
查看: 54138|回复: 50
发表于 2025-3-21 19:57:32 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning
副标题Proceedings of the F
编辑Beishui Liao,Yì N. Wáng
视频video
概述Highlights a range of new developments in philosophical logic by Asian logicians.Presents a collection of interdisciplinary research on the topic of philosophical logic.Given the variety of topics and
丛书名称Logic in Asia: Studia Logica Library
图书封面Titlebook: Context, Conflict and Reasoning; Proceedings of the F Beishui Liao,Yì N. Wáng Conference proceedings 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd
描述​This volume brings together a group of philosophically oriented logicians and logic-minded philosophers, mainly from Asia, to address a variety of logical and philosophical topics, such as modal logic and related directions (e.g. temporal logic, epistemic logic, deontic logic, logic of conditionals, and modal proof theory), theory of truth, paradoxes, intentionality, and social networks. New approaches are also proposed, such as extended modal logic with planarity of graphs, extended branching time temporal logic with conditional operators, and a relational treatment of language and logical systems, to name but a few..Given the variety of topics and issues discussed here, the book will appeal to readers from a broad range of disciplines, from mathematical/philosophical logic, computing science, cognitive science and artificial intelligence, to linguistics, game theory and beyond..
出版日期Conference proceedings 2020
关键词Philosophical logic; Modal Logic; Theory of truth; Conditionals; Epistemic logic; Temporal logic; Deontic
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7134-3
isbn_softcover978-981-15-7136-7
isbn_ebook978-981-15-7134-3Series ISSN 2364-4613 Series E-ISSN 2364-4621
issn_series 2364-4613
copyrightSpringer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning网络公开度




书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning被引频次




书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning被引频次学科排名




书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning年度引用




书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning年度引用学科排名




书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning读者反馈




书目名称Context, Conflict and Reasoning读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:56:27 | 显示全部楼层
Paracomplete Truth Theory with a Definable Hierarchy of Determinateness Operators,determinate-ness required to explain the rejection of paradoxical sentences involving the determinateness operator. In this paper, we show that Field’s complex extension of KFS is not required in order to express rejection of paradoxical sentences like the Liar sentence. Instead one can work with a
发表于 2025-3-22 04:26:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:12:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:09:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:59:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:21:09 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02254-8olovay’s method to construct paradoxes, which bear to the Solovay’s sentences much the same relation as the liar paradoxbears to the Gödel sentence. The main idea is to use the truth predicate instead of the provability predicate in the formalisation of the Solovay function. A typical example of suc
发表于 2025-3-22 22:58:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:56:59 | 显示全部楼层
LIRE: An Extensible Java CBIR Library,t. We propose that iterated best response (IBR) reasoning offers a reasonable solution to ambiguous pronoun processing. Using electroencephalogram (EEG) (14 channels) to investigate Chinese processing, we provide evidence that the processes of resolving ambiguous and unambiguous pronouns are signifi
发表于 2025-3-23 09:24:52 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02282-1 researchers point out that the solution of epistemic contextualism faces the problem of factivity: its basic proposition conficts with the factivity of knowledge. The key of epistemic contextualists is to distinguish the skeptical context of skepticism from the daily context, so as to solve the pro
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-30 12:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表