Titlebook: Constructing Risky Identities in Policy and Practice; Jeremy Kearney,Catherine Donovan Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmill

BAIT

http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/236009.jpg

Trabeculoplasty

Ethische Konsequenzen knapper Ressourcen and also at the level of how they live their own day-to-day lives (Lupton, 1999; Mythen and Walklate, 2006; Zinn, 2008). Whether it is, on the one hand, hearing experts debate the dangers posed by environmental disasters, violent conflicts between nations or economic meltdown, or on the other, maki

大气层

Betriebliche Energiewirtschaft,’, ‘advanced’ and ‘industrial’, but not as we knew it 50 years ago. This modernity is ‘late’, ‘high’, or even ‘post-’ modernity. Yet it is not clear what has changed: like many definitions of the present, the theory of risk society is essentially an historical interpretation of modernity which seeks

碌碌之人

Die institutionale Organisation,elfare it has had a particular impact on the development of policy and practice in the UK over the last few decades. Concern about risks to children have been greatly influenced by the overarching anxieties of the ‘risk society’ and its preoccupation with the many uncertain future risks generated by

Incompetent

Die institutionale Organisation,0s because of the transition from ‘industrial modernity’ to the era of ‘reflexive modernity’. According to Beck, the idea of civil rights occurred because of society’s increased access to welfare and education, which resulted in ‘lay’ members of society questioning professional knowledge and power.

COLIC

meretricious

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83895-7er 9 in this collection by Bowler). This chapter explores how the emphasis on risk thinking has individualised young people and made them responsible for the outcomes of their behaviour, while at the same time ignoring the often more influential structural factors that affect their lives.

Transfusion

FANG

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83897-1 late modernity’ (Giddens, 1991), ‘liquid modernity’ (Bauman, 2000) or ‘postmodernity’ (Harvey, 1990), is defined by the increasing prominence of information and communication technology (ICT) in our lives. As indicated above, this is often viewed in a positive manner, with ICTs presented as empower

全等

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83897-1 youth-work policy and practice. From this perspective, young people are now designated as either ‘at risk’ from a range of public and private dangers, or as ‘risky’ to themselves and others. In both cases, these categorisations are seen to be the result of personal, familial or communal deficiencie