找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Conservative Governments in the Age of Brexit; Matt Beech,Simon Lee Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

[复制链接]
楼主: 可乐
发表于 2025-3-28 17:29:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 22:32:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 00:47:18 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38577-4f the ‘devolution settlement’ in Scotland. By March 2020, government interventions in the UK as response to the COVID-19 pandemic shaped the nature of inter-governmental relations in the devolved UK and the approach of the Johnston Government to the constitution and devolution was characterised as ‘muscular’ unionism.
发表于 2025-3-29 04:16:54 | 显示全部楼层
Two Steps Backwards: UK Economic Policy in the Ages of Austerity and Brexit, 2015–2020s following the 2007–2008 financial crisis, namely a failure of both public sector and private business investment to match the levels sustained by their Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) competitors.
发表于 2025-3-29 08:11:54 | 显示全部楼层
Conservative Governments and Education Policy in the Age of Brexit, 2015 to 2020. Lastly, Boris Johnson’s brief administration would see further discontinuity in personnel, while his education policies largely consisted of an attempt to reconcile his predecessors’ preferred ideational views and to selectively combine and continue their respective policy legacies.
发表于 2025-3-29 12:54:37 | 显示全部楼层
The Submerged Welfare State: Health and Social Care Policy in England from 2015 to 2020 quality or cost savings, in part because of ongoing structural issues in health and social care that government policies failed to address sufficiently and sometimes exacerbated. Underfunding of services relative to demand, poor workforce recruitment and retention, and declining population health indicators were ongoing themes during this period.
发表于 2025-3-29 16:42:59 | 显示全部楼层
Conservative Welfare Policies: Ideational Oscillation in the Age of Brexittoric into policy implementation. Johnson, however, turned on the spending taps and thus shifted the dial towards a one nation position on social security. Yet this was not a paradigmatic shift within the parliamentary party.
发表于 2025-3-29 23:46:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 00:14:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 05:41:34 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-25 06:29
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表