Titlebook: Computational Psycholinguistics; An Interdisciplinary Matthew W. Crocker Book 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996 Index.behavior.grammar.l

harbinger

The Specification of Modules,d of the last chapter, we demonstrated both the organisation and operation of the syntactic processor, with only a minimal discussion of the constituent module’s processors — stressing above all that their individual incremental behaviour is imperative to the concurrent and incremental operation of

不整齐

Conclusions, human linguistic performance. In particular, we suggest that the architecture and operation of the human sentence processor are determined by the desire to achieve maximal modularity, for reasons of efficiency, while simultaneously demanding that the behaviour of these modules maximise incremental

Irritate

Book 1996nstrated to holduniversally. It is also argued that the behavior of modules, and thestrategies operative within them, can be derived from an overarching`Principle of Incremental Comprehension‘. ..Audience:. The book is recommended to all linguists,psycholinguists, computational linguists, and others

CLAN

1873-0043 overarching`Principle of Incremental Comprehension‘. ..Audience:. The book is recommended to all linguists,psycholinguists, computational linguists, and others978-0-7923-3806-2978-94-009-1600-5Series ISSN 1873-0043 Series E-ISSN 2215-1788

Conclave

多余

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27633-5the sentence processor as whole. In §V.2.3, however, we did make some more theoretical remarks concerning the advantages of decomposing syntactic analysis into simpler representational types. In addition, we defined the role of the respective meta-interpreters (repeated from (162) above), stating that they should: (169)

Ornament

1873-0043 underlie the human capacity toprocess language. It is the first such study to integrate modernsyntactic theory, cross-linguistic psychological evidence, and moderncomputational techniques in constructing a model of the human sentenceprocessing mechanism. .The monograph follows the rationalist tradi

anatomical

Spinal-Tap

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27633-5rence to such structure, theories of performance will be inherently superficial and uninteresting. Furthermore, to the extent that any proposed model of processing claims to be (at least partially) innate, it will crucially depend upon the knowledge of language determined by UG.

Foam-Cells

Perspectives on Sentence Processing, is isomorphic to that of the mind. Furthermore, we must situate the sentence processor with respect to the other cognitive systems with which it interacts, outlining the nature and degree of communication at all interfaces.