Titlebook: Class and Power in Sudan; The Dynamics of Suda Tim Niblock Book 1987 Tim Niblock 1987 dynamics.politics.Sudan

无力向前

书目名称Class and Power in Sudan影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Class and Power in Sudan影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Class and Power in Sudan网络公开度




书目名称Class and Power in Sudan网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Class and Power in Sudan被引频次




书目名称Class and Power in Sudan被引频次学科排名




书目名称Class and Power in Sudan年度引用




书目名称Class and Power in Sudan年度引用学科排名




书目名称Class and Power in Sudan读者反馈




书目名称Class and Power in Sudan读者反馈学科排名

Rodent

Social Forces under the Condominium,d shaped social forces within Sudan. This will lay the basis for describing the political dynamics of the nationalist movement as it developed in Sudan, and the political dynamics of post-independence Sudan. While the pattern of Sudanese politics may, in an immediate sense, have been determined by t

死亡

莎草

建筑师

,Politics and Economy under the Nimairi Regime, 1969–85,ior to that date. This is not to say that the ‘May revolution’ was a genuine revolution. The changes instituted in the country’s economic and social structure were, ultimately, insufficiently significant to justify using the term ‘revolution’. The political dynamics of the post-1969 state, however,

critic

Epilogue, and sugar which had just been announced, and the earlier 75 per cent rise in the price of petrol. After President Nimairi left Sudan on the following day for a medical check-up in the United States, the demonstrations spread. Many different elements of the population were drawn, largely spontaneous

critic

充满装饰

Kardiovaskulär wirksame Medikamentetructure were, ultimately, insufficiently significant to justify using the term ‘revolution’. The political dynamics of the post-1969 state, however, were quite different from those of the pre-1969 state — not just in an institutional sense, but in the manner in which political authority related to the country’s social forces.

变异

解开

,Politics and Economy under the Nimairi Regime, 1969–85,tructure were, ultimately, insufficiently significant to justify using the term ‘revolution’. The political dynamics of the post-1969 state, however, were quite different from those of the pre-1969 state — not just in an institutional sense, but in the manner in which political authority related to the country’s social forces.